Skip to content

There is a significant gap compared to the reported ACC of GCN on CiteSeer #2

Description

@QiZhang3709

I found that some data processing was done during testing on Citeseer, so I tested the performance of GCN on the processed data and obtained an ACC of 84.86 ± 0.14, which is significantly different from the results reported in the article. GCN is set to two layers, with an hidden dim is 512.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions