Docs section on pros/cons of using Opire is inaccurate

[KnorpelSenf]

🕵️‍♂️ Is there an existing issue for this?

• I have searched the existing issues

👁️ Current Behavior

The current docs at https://docs.opire.dev/overview/introduction#benefits-for-open-source-maintainers mention as the first point “You lose nothing” but that has recently become inaccurate.

🔮 Expected Behavior

Instead, they should mention the honest trade-offs. By having an issue registered on Opire, you expose your project to a constant flood of AI spam. Every few days or hours, a bot comments a generic "claiming this bounty" and then attempts to "solve" the problem. So the main issue with Opire is that you trade your free time developing software for moderating spam. Not a 1:1 trade, but definitely worth mentioning.

This issue is probably not going to be solved too soon, so the right approach would be to document this explicitly.

🔢 Steps To Reproduce

1. Open an issue, and make sure to stay subscribed
2. Register a bounty on the issue
3. Watch your notifications flood

🌐 Environment

n/a

🔍 Anything else?

Includes denoland/deno#18147 and many others.

---

This repo is using Opire - what does it mean? 👇

💵 Everyone can add rewards for this issue commenting /reward 100 (replace 100 with the amount).
🕵️‍♂️ If someone starts working on this issue to earn the rewards, they can comment /try to let everyone know!
🙌 And when they open the PR, they can comment /claim #37 either in the PR description or in a PR's comment.

🪙 Also, everyone can tip any user commenting /tip 20 @KnorpelSenf (replace 20 with the amount, and @KnorpelSenf with the user to tip).

📖 If you want to learn more, check out our documentation.