Skip to content

Docs - Clean up Payment Detection use case page #29

Description

@MantisClone

Problem

Payment Detection use case page contains AI warning, speculative content, unverified chain counts (claims 10+ but actual is 9), placeholder links, and marketing language that needs cleanup.

Key issues:

  • AI-generated warning box at top
  • Claims "10+ EVM chains" but should be 9 (Fantom deprecated)
  • Marketing copy vs factual benefits-focused language
  • Multiple placeholder # links
  • References to 553+ tokens needs verification
  • No tooltips for technical terms (blockchain, confirmations, webhooks, etc.)

Proposed Solution

Apply Invoicing page cleanup template to Payment Detection page:

  • Remove AI warning box
  • Verify and update chain count to 9
  • Replace marketing language with factual, benefits-focused copy
  • Fix or remove placeholder links (add notes for future pages)
  • Verify token count claim against codebase
  • Add tooltips for technical terms (blockchain, smart contract, webhook, confirmation, etc.)
  • Consider adding Check callout after key sections
  • Review code examples for accuracy
  • Verify detection speeds against actual performance
  • Update "Detection-Only vs Full Workflows" section for clarity

Considerations

  • Marketing page at https://request.network/payment-detection claims "25+ blockchains" but docs should reflect API reality (9 EVM chains)
  • Payment Detection is core functionality - accuracy is critical
  • Page is already comprehensive with good structure - focus on accuracy and removing slop
  • Code examples should be tested and realistic
  • Detection speeds should be verified (currently claims ~15s Ethereum, ~2s Polygon)

References

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions