You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The five init-able project starters have generated documentation snippets and anti-drift checks. Additional maintained golden workspaces, including Relay-only, Notary-only, snapshot-with-records, and country-variant OpenCRVS journeys, still rely on hand-maintained prose or partial workflow tests.
The primary project-authoring tutorial also remains marked as draft. This is a coverage and discoverability follow-up, not a reason to add fake starters for workspaces that are intentionally not starter templates.
Scope
Map each maintained golden workspace to the workflow steps it genuinely supports: init, test, trace, watch, check with explanation, and build.
Add missing success and negative tests only for supported steps.
Generate or mechanically validate documentation snippets for non-starter golden workspaces without pretending they support init.
Finish and publish the primary Registry Stack project-authoring tutorial, remove its draft status, and link it from the main author path.
Preserve the distinction between offline fixture evidence and live integration evidence.
Acceptance criteria
Every documented command for a maintained golden workspace is exercised by an automated check.
Relay-only and Notary-only topologies have successful check and build proof, plus fixture proof where fixtures apply.
Snapshot and country-variant examples cannot drift silently from their schemas or CLI flags.
Non-starter workspaces are never advertised as init-able starters.
The primary project-authoring tutorial is published, reachable from the main documentation author path, and uses only commands covered by automated checks.
Context
The five init-able project starters have generated documentation snippets and anti-drift checks. Additional maintained golden workspaces, including Relay-only, Notary-only, snapshot-with-records, and country-variant OpenCRVS journeys, still rely on hand-maintained prose or partial workflow tests.
The primary project-authoring tutorial also remains marked as draft. This is a coverage and discoverability follow-up, not a reason to add fake starters for workspaces that are intentionally not starter templates.
Scope
init,test,trace,watch,checkwith explanation, andbuild.init.Acceptance criteria
checkandbuildproof, plus fixture proof where fixtures apply.Related work