I think we should provide a new page on Agentic AI. Like the existing page, it would start by drawing from my experience with it:
I think it should remain mostly tool/model agnostic, and have something like the following:
- Guidelines for an
AI_POLICY.md (and maybe a few suggested examples for different levels of AI support)
- Guidelines on how to provide an
AGENTS.md (and maybe a mention that one harness doesn't support it (Claude Code), and how to fix it (symlink CLAUDE.md to AGENTS.md).
- Best practices for AI usage, with user-level AGENTS.md suggestions. My strong opinion is full disclosure and transparency:
- Linux kernel trailers
- AI text disclaimers for generated text
- Human interaction to human review
- Very brief overview of the skills standard (maybe a few links like skills.sh
- A suggested list of things that AI is good at, similar to the setting up page above, maybe with sample prompts
- Warnings for things AI is bad at
- Maybe a brief intro to common harness features
- A list of some common concerns (unless already covered organically above)
Maybe would also be good to help clarify the difference between low-cost models running in automated systems like OpenClaw (which tend to be the thing most associated with "AI slop") vs. a developer using an AI harness and a quality model.
We might be able to use tabs to have "all in", "moderate", "minimal", such as for the AI_POLICY.md and maybe adjusting suggestions (like adding a AGENTS.md vs. git ignoring vs. not mentioning at all, and letting users add it to .git/info/exclude).
Open to thoughts!
I think we should provide a new page on Agentic AI. Like the existing page, it would start by drawing from my experience with it:
I think it should remain mostly tool/model agnostic, and have something like the following:
AI_POLICY.md(and maybe a few suggested examples for different levels of AI support)AGENTS.md(and maybe a mention that one harness doesn't support it (Claude Code), and how to fix it (symlinkCLAUDE.mdtoAGENTS.md).Maybe would also be good to help clarify the difference between low-cost models running in automated systems like OpenClaw (which tend to be the thing most associated with "AI slop") vs. a developer using an AI harness and a quality model.
We might be able to use tabs to have "all in", "moderate", "minimal", such as for the
AI_POLICY.mdand maybe adjusting suggestions (like adding aAGENTS.mdvs. git ignoring vs. not mentioning at all, and letting users add it to.git/info/exclude).Open to thoughts!