/
+```
+
+The EnSight post-processing files are written in the `postprocessing` subdirectory and can be opened with ParaView.
+
+## Post-processing
+
+The main fields of interest are:
+
+- velocity magnitude;
+- streamwise velocity and recirculation zones;
+- time-averaged velocity;
+- normalized mean streamwise velocity;
+- smoke concentration;
+- turbulent quantities $k$, $\omega$ and turbulent viscosity;
+- wall $y^+$, when assessing near-wall resolution.
+
+## Results
+
+### Velocity magnitude
+
+
+
+
+ Figure 2: Instantaneous velocity magnitude through the streets of the city.
+
+The flow accelerates in narrow streets and around building corners, while low-speed and recirculating regions develop in sheltered areas and behind large obstacles. The highest velocities form preferential paths aligned with the imposed wind direction.
+
+### Normalized mean velocity
+
+
+
+
+ Figure 3: Normalized mean streamwise velocity, $\overline{u}_x/U_{\mathrm{in}}$.
+
+
+The time-averaged field highlights persistent acceleration corridors and regions of mean reverse flow. Negative values correspond to recirculation, whereas values greater than one indicate local acceleration relative to the imposed inlet velocity.
+
+### Smoke dispersion
+
+
+
+
+ Figure 4: Passive-smoke concentration released from the localized source in the city centre.
+
+
+The pollutant plume is advected through the connected street network. Its trajectory is controlled by the local wind field, building wakes and street-channeling effects. Concentration decreases away from the source due to advection and turbulent diffusion.
+
+## Discussion and limitations
+
+This case reproduces the main qualitative behaviour expected for wind and pollutant transport in a complex urban layout. It is useful for learning mesh handling, turbulent external-flow setup, scalar transport and volumetric source terms in code_saturne.
+
+The following limitations should be considered when interpreting the results:
+
+- the city geometry is treated as effectively two-dimensional;
+- all buildings have the same extruded height in the thin domain;
+- the surrounding city outside the circular domain is omitted;
+- atmospheric boundary-layer profiles and thermal stratification are not modelled;
+- the mesh is relatively coarse for quantitative wall-resolved predictions;
+- the smoke is passive and does not include heat release, buoyancy, combustion or deposition;
+- the source strength is illustrative and is not calibrated to a particular fire scenario.
+
+Consequently, the results should be interpreted as a numerical demonstration and qualitative risk-visualization case, not as a certified urban-safety assessment.
+
+
+## References
+
+1. code_saturne documentation: https://www.code-saturne.org/
+2. F. R. Menter, “Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications,” *AIAA Journal*, 32(8), 1994, pp. 1598–1605.
+
+
+## Authors
+
+[Simvia](https://Simvia.tech/fr) - Questions, remarks and requests are welcome.
+