You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have searched existing issues to ensure this feature hasn't been requested before
I have read the project documentation and contribution guidelines
🎯 Problem Statement
IssueMatch is asking for full repo access with read and write for all private and public repos which is something users might hesitate to give access to.
💡 Proposed Solution
I want to add a feature so that users can select which access to give (and later also add a feature where they can add and remove these accesses).
This way this product will respect users privacy.
🔄 Alternatives Considered
I am not sure how this would affect the issue match result but i would like to consider that too
📊 Priority Level
High - Significant impact on productivity
🎭 Use Cases
This users can add or remove whichever access they dont want to share
📎 Additional Context
No response
🤝 Contribution
I'm willing to submit a pull request for this feature
I'm available to help with testing
I can provide additional feedback during development
We'll review it as soon as possible. We truly appreciate your contributions! ✨
Meanwhile make sure you've visited the README.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, and CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md before creating a PR for this. Also, please do NOT create a PR until this issue has been assigned to you. 😊
repo:status - Grants read/write access to commit statuses in public and private repositories. This scope is only necessary to grant other users or services access to private repository commit statuses without granting access to the code.
do we need the code access or just commits is alright.
and also i am trying to find more restrictive access from github scopes but they either give read only access to organisation projects or give both read and write access. Do you have any leads
repo:status - Grants read/write access to commit statuses in public and private repositories. This scope is only necessary to grant other users or services access to private repository commit statuses without granting access to the code.
do we need the code access or just commits is alright. and also i am trying to find more restrictive access from github scopes but they either give read only access to organisation projects or give both read and write access. Do you have any leads
Activity
github-actions commentedon Aug 27, 2025
Thank you for raising this issue!
We'll review it as soon as possible. We truly appreciate your contributions! ✨
kalikaruto commentedon Aug 31, 2025
@AvishkarPatil need help here,
repo:status -
Grants read/write access to commit statuses in public and private repositories. This scope is only necessary to grant other users or services access to private repository commit statuses without granting access to the code.do we need the code access or just commits is alright.
and also i am trying to find more restrictive access from github scopes but they either give read only access to organisation projects or give both read and write access. Do you have any leads
kashifalikhan36 commentedon Dec 27, 2025
Please assign me this issue, I'll help @kalikaruto
kalikaruto commentedon Dec 27, 2025
Please, can you take this.
kashifalikhan36 commentedon Dec 27, 2025
yeah, i'll try my best
AvishkarPatil commentedon Dec 27, 2025
Yes, only read access is necessary here
roshankumar0036singh commentedon Dec 27, 2025
I would like to work on it please assign me this and will it be ok if I make a pr Tommorow and you can merge it after 1 jan for swoc @AvishkarPatil
kashifalikhan36 commentedon Dec 28, 2025
@AvishkarPatil please review #57 and yeah please merge on 1st of Jan for swoc
kashifalikhan36 commentedon Dec 31, 2025
@AvishkarPatil i've updated the pull request #58 , please merge that for SWOC, and yeah alot a tag of SWOC on this issue