Repository navigation
Conversation
adecler
requested review from
IsakNaslundBh,
al-fisher and
alelom
as code owners
October 26, 2026 17:27
This was referenced Oct 29, 2026
Member
Author
|
@adecler to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
There are 101 requests in the queue ahead of you. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issues addressed by this PR
Closes #3618
As mentioned in the issue, the solution in this PR focuses on two aspects:
There is a separate commit for each of those. Note that is is critical for the deserialisation to support both versions of the json to guarantee that the legacy json format is supported.
There are then two additional commits directly related:
Then, because I am also looking at the strongly related issue of lazy loading for Revit, I have added two commits to this PR:
Test files
I'll write something tomorrow but wanted to, at least, have the PR created.
@IsakNaslundBh, you'll be the main reviewer on this so let's have a catchup sometime this week.
Changelog
Additional comments