Skip to content

Facade_Engine: UValue handling improved with UValueCavity included for UValueSAM and UValueCAM Methods - #3633

Open
enarhi wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
Facade_Engine-#3632-FixUVAlueSAMCavity
Open

enarhi wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
Facade_Engine-#3632-FixUVAlueSAMCavity

Conversation

@enarhi

@enarhi enarhi commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Issues addressed by this PR

Closes #3632

Added consistent implementation of Cont and Cavity UValues for each UValue method. Refactoring / cleanup of UValue fragment handling will be included in a future PR.

Test files

Facade_Engine core test file

@enarhi
enarhi requested a review from vgreen-BH October 27, 2026 22:01
@enarhi enarhi changed the title UValue handling improved with UValueCavity included for UValueSAM and UValueCAM Methods Facade_Engine: UValue handling improved with UValueCavity included for UValueSAM and UValueCAM Methods Oct 27, 2026
@enarhi enarhi self-assigned this Nov 3, 2026
@enarhi enarhi added type:bug Error or unexpected behaviour type:feature New capability or enhancement and removed type:bug Error or unexpected behaviour labels Nov 3, 2026

@vgreen-BH vgreen-BH left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested using linked test script. Behaves as expected

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

type:feature New capability or enhancement

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Facade_Engine: Fix UValueSAM method to account for UValueCavity

2 participants