docs: fix README typos and refresh Debugging poller guidance - #219
Open
somethingwithproof wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
docs: fix README typos and refresh Debugging poller guidance#219somethingwithproof wants to merge 2 commits into
somethingwithproof wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR updates project documentation by fixing a few typos and modernizing outdated debugging guidance around poller execution and packaging defaults.
Changes:
- Corrects spelling in README ToC and template documentation descriptions.
- Fixes a typo in translation contribution guidance.
- Replaces an obsolete Debugging section (Cacti 0.8.6h / “upcoming 0.9”) with current guidance on avoiding duplicate pollers and using
cactid.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
README.md |
Fixes typos in the reporting ToC entry and template configuration text. |
Debugging.md |
Removes stale historical content and adds a new section on duplicate poller entries / cactid usage. |
Contributing-Translations.md |
Fixes a typo in the GPL acknowledgment sentence. |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
somethingwithproof
added a commit
to somethingwithproof/documentation
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 10, 2026
Refs Cacti#219 Signed-off-by: Thomas Vincent <thomasvincent@gmail.com>
somethingwithproof
force-pushed
the
fix/docs-typos-stale-content
branch
from
March 10, 2026 20:57
77a9cab to
5670ec9
Compare
Refs Cacti#219 Signed-off-by: Thomas Vincent <thomasvincent@gmail.com>
somethingwithproof
force-pushed
the
fix/docs-typos-stale-content
branch
from
March 15, 2026 05:20
5670ec9 to
6427666
Compare
The prior edit softened the licensing statement into hedged wording. Restore the original clear acknowledgment that Weblate contributions are GPL2.0+. Signed-off-by: Thomas Vincent <thomasvincent@gmail.com>
somethingwithproof
changed the title
Contributor
Author
|
Both review points are already covered by the current content: the duplicate-entries checklist includes |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
README.md
Debugging.md
cactidsystemd service, check for duplicate poller entries from packages, notewww-datavscactiuserfor Debian/UbuntuTest plan