-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Gsn member profile #313
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
nikithaguduru
wants to merge
14
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
gsn_member_profile
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Gsn member profile #313
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7cac335
implementing member profile page
nikithaguduru fe59cbe
ui changes
nikithaguduru 55ba4b6
ui changes for member portal
nikithaguduru 03faab1
fixed lint issues
nikithaguduru 29fbf92
fixing build failures
nikithaguduru a369a78
fixing build failures
nikithaguduru b6f6136
fixing build failures
nikithaguduru fe99b11
resolving sonar cloud issues
nikithaguduru f688dba
resolving sonar cloud issues
nikithaguduru bf648dc
resolving sonar cloud issues
nikithaguduru 9230389
resolving sonar cloud issues
nikithaguduru 7de7835
addressed review comments
nikithaguduru 5b30606
fixing reviewer comments
nikithaguduru d8409a7
fixing reviewer comments
nikithaguduru File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The change in the application-services command file for
updateMemberProfile(...)is correct, for removing that unnecessary permission check. But I still expect the command to throw an error if a member attempts to update a member document that is not their own (i.e different ObjectID).We still want to test here to assert that behavior in the situation where a member is trying to edit not their own member document. The difference is we want the aggregate/entity classes in the domain layer (@ocom/domain) to be the source of truth for permissions, using their visas. The setter methods for the fields like
memberNameandprofile.nameshould be checking the visa on that class for thepermissions.isEdititngOwnMemberpredicate (which automatically does the ObjectID comparison you removed from the application-services code, that's why we don't need it there).I don't see any changes to the member classes in @ocom/domain so once you adjust the behavior there, this test scenario can be restored to check for the correct expected behavior that the command throws when a member tries updating another member. Let me know if you have questions about enforcing the domain permissions in the Member classes, it should already be configured for you to do so in the code there.