Repository navigation
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
HOLD: unpublished review candidate. This Draft targets the existing unpublished Doctor feature branch behind #27, not main. Do not merge it into a formal Git marketplace source, install it for users, package it or release Doctor. #27 and its existing branch history remain unchanged.
Hosted Doctor follow-ups need a stable original report and saved observations of the actual native tool result. Use the explicit original report and its SHA as the baseline; append each real supplied tool observation in a separate file without changing the original. Keep the actual host/scope/service/project and exposed call identifiers where available, and preserve unknowns. A supplied result is not independent proof of the original session, production account authentication or recovery.
Provide optional offline capture and feedback from existing reports. Reuse one canonical collector with generated self-contained copies, aligned with the collector 1.2.6 candidate in #29. Existing report files and sidecars remain intact; the original report is explicitly referenced for each follow-up.
Saved-report delivery has a single owner and a separate SHA-bound receipt. An attempted POST without a valid complete ACK, including HTTP500/503 or a malformed/interrupted response, remains delivery-uncertain and blocks a blind resend. No-attempt validation failures retain local evidence. ACK still does not prove complete storage. Content-only native MCP results can be saved without inventing projects[] or structuredContent; explicit failed results/configuration/tool discovery/independent probes cannot be recorded as a successful native recheck.
Validation on Windows:
git diff --check: passed. Plugin manifests/versions are unchanged.Still required before any release decision: actual natural-language triggering in target Codex and Claude sessions, justified repair of a real evidenced failure, an actual read-only tool call in the original host/scope/service/project, saved linked recheck results, and appropriate production storage verification. This Draft must not be described as real-user recovery or completed end-to-end acceptance.
Need help on this PR? Tag
@codesmith-botwith what you need.