Correct assignment planning and hosting recovery references - #3053
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
Independent fresh-context Luna review is clean at The catalogue's older baseline pointer remains a non-blocking historical reference because the document explicitly requires reconciliation against the candidate; no follow-up edit is needed for this bounded correction. Runtime recovery drills and activation decisions remain unverified/separate. The old Smart CI Plan run |
|
Reviewed source commits are now included in integration PR #3054 at |
Planning documents still described assignment/import delivery as parked, and the private-hosting follow-up described backup/restore commands as missing. Record the merged assignment contract and use the existing packaged recovery commands when preparing a future Render restore drill.
This changes three reference documents. Estimate qualification, device/QA acceptance, private-origin protections, cost/capacity decisions and hosting activation remain separate. No runtime behavior, human checkbox or deployment setting changes.
Verified: documentation links, GitHub operations governance, documentation governance and
git diff --checkpass atdf8fb6c6012f13cb711b1b9041864aa9488c3119. No runtime suite or restore drill was performed for this documentation correction.Closes #3044