You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Crystal Geyser graph: distinguish lipid-acquisition hypotheses from measured transfer #1365
The graph's SYNTROPHY label asserts product-removal cooperation not demonstrated by this field study; COMMENSALISM on lysolipid curvature adaptation likewise invents a donor fitness sign. The lipid-transfer arrow treats imported material as established. The source instead combines stable carbon isotopes, genome content, lipid correlations, mixed size-fraction lipidomics and FTIR. It explicitly leaves possible ACP-independent biosynthesis open in some Nealsonbacteria and proposes scavenging degraded biomass or host-derived lipids. CPR-enriched fractions are not pure CPR isolates, and correlation does not identify a donor or trace lipid transfer. Depth-associated unsaturation does not demonstrate that donor mechanism or a pressure perturbation response.
Acceptance: retain all three nodes and two source-proposed causal links with explicit PARTIAL/HYPOTHESIZED boundaries; preserve the positive mostly-autotrophic carbon evidence. Distinguish broad producer-pool context from resolved bacterial/archaeal donors, retain CPR-associated lysolipid observations without tested curvature benefit, and preserve canonical taxon groundings. Remove unsupported categorical syntrophy/commensalism, qualify the possible alternative biosynthesis and donor routes in a focused gap, and add guarded curation history, tests and rendered-page checks. No new nodes/arrows or Edison spend is needed for this repair.
Primary source: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-020-0624-4 (Probst et al., 2020; PMID:32203118; PMC7242380; CC BY 4.0). Complete cached independently retrieved main body, table and captions read; no figure images or supplementary files inspected. Dedup: 698 all-state issue titles/bodies and ignored/hidden-inclusive reports, research, history, tests, scripts and .github search. No exact finding in this scope; not every issue comment was searched. Self-adversarial review, not independent approval.
Addressed by #1367 at d82bf3ed87f5166e7ae41d763f90ff4d2bd8cccc with exact-head self-adversarial COMMENT review #1367 (review). 330 passed in 225.67s (0:03:45); actual post-commit docs-current passed. The graph retains three nodes/two explicitly hypothetical arrows, canonical participants and an anchored evidence gap. Non-graph #1366 remains open. This issue closes only on protected main merge.
Activity
realmarcin commentedon Oct 6, 2026
Addressed by #1367 at
d82bf3ed87f5166e7ae41d763f90ff4d2bd8ccccwith exact-head self-adversarial COMMENT review #1367 (review). 330 passed in 225.67s (0:03:45); actual post-commit docs-current passed. The graph retains three nodes/two explicitly hypothetical arrows, canonical participants and an anchored evidence gap. Non-graph #1366 remains open. This issue closes only on protected main merge.