Skip to content

Fahmy T4 metadata: record salinity and diamide-assay temperature inconsistencies #1371

Open

Description

@realmarcin

Non-graph follow-up from review of CommunityMech:000369, Cyantraniliprole_Fahmy_Consortium_T4.yaml. Primary paper, PMID:42354927.

The abstract and record's optimization metadata give 0.5-5.0% NaCl as optimal, whereas Results 3.2.3 and Discussion state maximum biomass at 0.0-0.5% and reduced biomass at 5.0%. The assay is OD600 growth, not a direct degradation-rate optimization. Table 6 gives 35 C for the broad-diamide assay, while Methods 2.7 says 30 C and 0.5 g/L NaCl. These conflicting source statements should not be silently harmonized or treated as one verified protocol.

Review the relevant primary figure/data and qualify the environmental_factors/growth_media claims and evidence. Preserve the distinction between growth proxies and HPLC parent-removal measurements, and between standardized inoculum density and final microcosm concentration. Graph-only curation does not resolve these metadata fields.

Deduplication: 700 all-state issue titles/bodies, relevant prior issues, and ignored/hidden-inclusive local review/history searches. Not every issue comment was searched.

Activity

  1. realmarcin commented on Oct 6, 2026

    @realmarcin
    ContributorAuthor

    Graph-only corrections published in #1374. This non-graph metadata issue remains open: those record blocks are byte-preserved, not certified or silently corrected by the graph review. Source-scope limits and the related graph decisions are in the committed review records.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions