You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Ferroplasma metadata: reconcile unverified physiology, medium and syntrophy claims #1462
Outside the graph, description and taxonomy retain definitive detoxification/syntrophy, equal-partner abundance and broad oxygen, temperature and metal-tolerance claims. Exact mineral surfaces, stable natural partnership and lower-oxygen complementarity are not demonstrated by the inspected sources. The 0.04% yeast-extract optimum is BRL-115 characterization, not a proven requirement of the mixed culture. Growth media contain duplicated ingredients and differing iron-sulfate concentrations; recipe and aeration details need source-specific verification. Environmental-factor explanations often overstate what their cited abstract snippets establish.
Acceptance: source-review these non-graph fields separately without replacing canonical NCBI/GTDB mappings with the Y(T) comparator or transferring isolated-protein findings to BRL-115. Graph-only repairs preserve these fields, not certify them. #1356/#1358 concern a different copper-heap record and do not resolve this pair's metadata. Only source abstracts read for this record; primary full text was not accessible through the attempted publisher path.
Deduplication: 778 all-state issue titles/bodies plus ignored/hidden-inclusive local reports, research, history and tests searched. All seven matched issue bodies read (#1358/#1356/#1173/#1171/#1170/#1169/#1080); relevant prior curation histories inspected. No exact duplicate within that scope; comments and PR reviews were not exhaustively searched. Source-based self-adversarial review, not independent approval.
Graph-only review published in #1464. This non-graph followup remains OPEN; original raw metadata blocks were preserved, not certified. No strain, medium, taxonomy-role or top-level wording repair is claimed.
Activity
realmarcin commentedon Oct 6, 2026
Graph-only review published in #1464. This non-graph followup remains OPEN; original raw metadata blocks were preserved, not certified. No strain, medium, taxonomy-role or top-level wording repair is claimed.