Garlic SynCom6 graph: remove design-workflow nodes and bound the radish seedling endpoint #1476

CommunityMech:000095; Garlic_Pseudomonas_SynCom6; PMID:32762153; doi:10.1111/1751-7915.13640.

The complete cached primary main body/Methods/captions separates field Pseudomonas enrichment/co-occurrence screening in garlic from equal-proportion SynCom construction and the two-day radish seedling-length assay. Selection and assembly are experimental workflow, not ecological interactions. The earlier 2026-10-02 curation removed both workflow arrows but left these two nodes. The M and M+B groups outperform sterile-water CK and B8-7 alone; B8-7 neither promotes radish growth nor significantly changes M's effect. The experiment does not compare M against each of its six Pseudomonas monocultures and cannot assign six-strain synergy, each strain's necessity, field garlic yield benefit or a metabolite mechanism.

Acceptance: remove the two workflow nodes and their unsupported GO symbiosis annotations; preserve a single bounded community-level radish growth outcome with explicit in-vivo evidence and canonical Pseudomonas umbrella participant. Do not invent six species IDs from provisional 16S names. Preserve the prior arrow-removal event and all non-graph raw blocks; document screening/assembly context and the unresolved mechanism/roster in a discussion. Add guarded history, focused tests, regenerated page and review/validation records. No new causal structure or provider spend required.

Source-based self-adversarial review, not independent approval. All three whole YAML records were read. Main text, Methods and embedded captions were read; no figure images, separate supplementary files, raw data or analysis code audited. Dedup searched 790 all-state issue titles/bodies and ignored/hidden-inclusive reports, research, history, tests, scripts and workflows. Five matched issue bodies (#624/#543/#486/#326/#17) and the UFMP/Garlic prior history artifacts were read; none duplicates these source-specific causal-scope repairs. Existing validation and render logs also match record names but do not constitute completed source reviews. Not every issue comment or PR review was inspected.