Skip to content

Complete the source-supported acetate branch in Geobacter-Methanosarcina after Edison review #1483

Open

Description

@realmarcin

CommunityMech:000033; Geobacter_Methanosarcina_DIET; PMID:24837373, doi:10.1128/AEM.00895-14.

The primary paper describes acetate as an additional methane substrate in the defined coculture. Its bulk stoichiometry is not an isotope measurement of route-specific methane, and DIET-only support of methanogen growth remains a proposed future test. The current graph omits the acetate branch; a bounded CO2 node alone is incomplete.

Acceptance: inspect a specifically authorized one-community Edison causal report and independently verify proposed structure against this primary system, without importing the Methanosaeta radiotracer experiment or the differently cultured Pelobacter/H2 comparison. Add only supported acetate-transfer/conversion structure with canonical taxa, evidence, guarded history, tests, rendered page and exact-byte decision records. Keep needs_research until completed. Separate dry run completed with 13,853 characters and no API calls/credits. Specific authorization requested asynchronously; no paid job/report yet. The ASM-copyrighted full PDF stays in temporary storage, not git.

Source-based self-adversarial review, not independent approval. Whole records were read, with a pre-source both-root baseline from batch45 and a fresh unchanged-target/cache baseline for batch46. Complete primary main texts/Methods/captions were read for 2014 papers and the 2023 T6SS study. Selected 2014 figure images were inspected; no separate supplements, raw data or analysis code audited. All794 open/closed issue titles/bodies and ignored/hidden local review/history/research/tests/scripts/workflows searched; matched bodies #1091/#751/#306 read. Existing validator/cache issues are not duplicated. Not every issue comment or PR review inspected.

Activity

  1. realmarcin commented on Oct 6, 2026

    @realmarcin
    ContributorAuthor

    Existing-node corrections published, but this missing-branch issue remains OPEN and the record remains needs_research. No paid job or completed expansion is claimed. #1484 at b59f9d6; exact-head self-adversarial review: #1484 (review). 461 passed in 211.31s (0:03:31); post-commit docs-current passed. Decisions, actual outputs and limitations committed. Not independent approval.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions