Skip to content

Review Pseudomonas PHB ingredient attribution outside repaired PHA graph #1861

Open

Description

@realmarcin

Finding

CommunityMech:000167. related_ingredients calls PHB a representative output based on an introduction passage spanning several different heterotrophs, while the direct 2017 Pseudomonas experiment measured medium-chain-length PHA. Reconcile product scope without inferring the DNT-study polymer composition from its crotonic-acid proxy alone. General growth-media settings combine different implementations and require assay-specific attribution; graph repair deliberately leaves these non-graph fields unchanged.

Evidence And Scope

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32064751/
Whole three canonical records and all ten nodes/six existing arrows reviewed. Independently retrieved primary abstract for Halomonas; primary main text/captions for Shewanella, PHA, DNT and multi-omics; nitrate-study abstract and relevant coculture Results/Discussion. Exact read spans and limitations will accompany the decision ledger. No raw data or separate supplement/figure-pixel audit.

Fresh all-state issue title/body dedup and ignored/hidden-inclusive local searches performed. Read matching #1093/#258/#1851/#1669/#1606/#1605/#837/#836/#835 and related #529; no duplicate exact finding in that bounded scope. PRs/comments and all local historical reports were not exhaustively read.

Lifecycle

Keep open after graph-repair merge until the distinct follow-up is verified. Self-adversarial review is not independent approval. Existing graph repairs add no topology or provider spend.

Activity

  1. realmarcin commented on Oct 8, 2026

    @realmarcin
    ContributorAuthor

    Follow-up remains open; this PR documents but does not resolve it. #1864 at 4f41c29; exact-head self-review #1864 (review). 994 passed in 335.27s (0:05:35); postcommit docs-current passed. Decisions, 35 gate outputs/digests, four append-only histories and four mutation probes are recorded. One known snippet-audit ligature false positive is explicit (#1863); source-access and non-graph limits remain. Self-review is not independent approval.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions