Skip to content
View DCCA's full-sized avatar
🎯
Focus
🎯
Focus
  • São Paulo

Block or report DCCA

Block user

Prevent this user from interacting with your repositories and sending you notifications. Learn more about blocking users.

You must be logged in to block users.

Maximum 250 characters. Please don’t include any personal information such as legal names or email addresses. Markdown is supported. This note will only be visible to you.
Report abuse

Contact GitHub support about this user’s behavior. Learn more about reporting abuse.

Report abuse
DCCA/README.md

Daniel Andrade

Senior fintech product leader building AI systems that turn noisy inputs into reviewable decisions.

I lead product teams in fintech and build hands-on AI/product systems for signal curation, evaluation, local-first automation, and human-in-the-loop review.

My bias: AI becomes useful when it is connected to a real workflow, grounded in source evidence, and constrained by clear human approval boundaries.

Selected systems

System What it proves Status
AI Signal Desk A live AI signal product that turns noisy AI news, tools, repos, and concepts into practical calls: learn, try, watch, or ignore. Live at aisignaldesk.ai
skval Deterministic + LLM-assisted evaluation for Claude Code skills, with safety gates and ship/revise/reject scorecards. CLI + docs site
vyno Local-first AI digest pipeline with source curation, scoring, Telegram delivery, Obsidian archiving, and an operator console. Personal automation
shotback Human-in-the-loop visual QA workflow for screenshot capture, annotation, and LLM-ready product feedback. Chrome workflow
loopy Reusable agentic maintenance loops with deterministic detection, guardrails, and reviewable outputs. Agent ops toolkit

What I am exploring

Most AI products fail in the gap between impressive output and trusted operation. I’m interested in the operating layer in between:

  • Signal curation — reducing information overload into useful next actions.
  • Evaluation and quality gates — making AI-assisted work testable instead of vibe-checked.
  • Human approval loops — AI drafts, ranks, and proposes; people decide.
  • Local-first automation — useful systems that remain inspectable, portable, and permission-aware.
  • Product review artifacts — preserving source context, visual evidence, decisions, and tradeoffs.

Earlier / exploratory systems

These are useful context, but not the center of my current portfolio:

  • firehose — an earlier spec-driven workflow method for aligning AI coding agents with product intent.
  • hermes-product-teams — a product-memory prototype exploring discovery notes, decision logs, PRD proposals, and weekly product briefs.
  • sandy — a schema-first mobile UI prototyping sandbox for design-system and server-driven UI experiments.

Background

I’m a Group Product Manager / Sr. Manager at Neon in São Paulo, with previous fintech and product leadership experience at Mercado Libre, Leve, PagSeguro PagBank, and ConectCar.

I use GitHub as a public workshop for practical AI/product systems: small enough to inspect, real enough to validate, and opinionated enough to show how I think.

Operating principles

  • Start with the user workflow, not the model.
  • Keep evidence attached to generated claims.
  • Prefer reversible, inspectable systems over opaque automation.
  • Use deterministic checks and fixtures where possible.
  • Treat agents as collaborators that need context, constraints, and review.

If you’re building at the intersection of product leadership, fintech, and practical AI systems, I’m happy to compare notes.

LinkedIn · GitHub

Pinned Loading

  1. shotback shotback Public

    Chrome extension for screenshot review, annotation, and LLM-assisted visual feedback

    TypeScript

  2. vyno vyno Public

    Local-first AI Daily Digest for Telegram + Obsidian with source curation, scoring, scheduling, and a React operator console.

    Python