Skip to content

Updated readme seo aeo - #9

Open
ashutoshkhainar33-star wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
node-sdk-readme-se-aeo-update
Open

Updated readme seo aeo#9
ashutoshkhainar33-star wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
node-sdk-readme-se-aeo-update

Conversation

@ashutoshkhainar33-star

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

FastPix Node SDK - Documentation PR

Documentation Changes

What Changed

  • New documentation added
  • Existing documentation updated
  • Documentation errors fixed
  • Code examples updated
  • Links and references updated
  • Other

Files Modified

  • README.md
  • docs/ files
  • USAGE.md
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
  • Other: _______________

Summary

Brief description of changes:

Added the SEO/AEO layer to the generated README, without changing any code.

Added:
- Badges (npm version, npm downloads, license, TypeScript) using the correct package
  name @fastpix/fastpix-node
- A keyword-rich value paragraph naming concrete capabilities (uploads, live streaming,
  simulcasts, playback IDs, playlists, signing keys, video analytics, webhooks, in-video AI)
- A "Works with" line (Node.js 18+, TypeScript/JavaScript, ESM/CJS, npm/pnpm/yarn/bun)
  and docs / free-account CTAs
- An 11-question FAQ (install, auth, TS/ESM/CJS, upload, live stream, analytics, webhooks,
  errors, retries, custom HTTP client, tree-shaking, Node versions) - each linking a real section
- A "Which FastPix SDK should I use?" table linking the verified server SDKs
  (Node, PHP, Python, Go, Java, C#, Ruby) and the browser client repos

Structure:
- Demoted the second H1 (`# Development`) to `##` so there is a single page H1
- Added FAQ + the SDK table to the Table of Contents
- Kept the H1 ("FastPix Node.js SDK") so the TOC self-anchor keeps working

Every existing code block preserved byte-for-byte (18 blocks, 0 added); the generated
<!-- ... --> markers, <details> blocks, and developers' prose are untouched.

NOTE: this README is generated - apply via the generator template so it is not
overwritten on the next regeneration.

Code Examples (if Applicable)

N/A - no code examples were added or modified in this PR.
All existing code blocks were preserved exactly as-is (the developers' tested code),
verified byte-for-byte by hashing.

Testing

  • All code examples tested — N/A (no code examples were added or changed)
  • Links verified
  • Grammar checked
  • Formatting consistent

Review Checklist

  • Content is accurate
  • Code examples work — N/A (no code examples were added or changed; existing blocks preserved)
  • Links are working
  • Grammar is correct
  • Formatting is consistent

SEO/AEO eval

Score: 7/8 Present; only the repo rename remains. About, Topics, and Website have been applied on the repo; this PR covers badges, landing structure, interlinks, and the FAQ. All correctness gates pass; developer code blocks unchanged (18/18 byte-for-byte, same hash, 0 added).

# Criterion Result
1 Repo name optimized node-sdk -> rename to fastpix-node (repo setting, not this PR)
2 About keywords ✅ applied on repo (keyword-rich)
3 Badges (npm, downloads, license, TypeScript) ✅ added in this PR
4 README descriptive (landing page) ✅ added in this PR
5 GitHub topics (16) ✅ applied on repo
6 Interlinks (verified 7-language SDK table + client repos + org) ✅ added in this PR
7 Releases + package ✅ 13 releases + 13 tags; published npm package @fastpix/fastpix-node (v2.0.9)
8 FAQ (11 questions) ✅ added in this PR

Gates: correct package name everywhere (@fastpix/fastpix-node), no code edited/added (18 blocks preserved, same hash), no fabricated repos (every SDK in the table verified live), license/version accurate (MIT, npm v2.0.9), links resolve.

Already applied on the repo (not part of this PR): About description, 16 Topics, and the Website field are live.

Still outstanding (repo settings / generator-side): rename node-sdk -> fastpix-node; add package.json description + keywords; add a LICENSE file. Because the README is generated, apply this PR's content via the generator template.


Ready for review!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant