Skip to content

fix(auto): forward explicit confirmation to custom probing - #14

Open
DivyamTalwar wants to merge 1 commit into
FedericoTs:masterfrom
DivyamTalwar:fix/qp-auto-confirmation
Open

DivyamTalwar wants to merge 1 commit into
FedericoTs:masterfrom
DivyamTalwar:fix/qp-auto-confirmation

Conversation

@DivyamTalwar

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Fixes #13.

The custom pipeline builds a probe Namespace without the explicit yes flag. After downloading a source, an expensive probe can ask again or abort a noninteractive run telling the user to pass the flag they already supplied. Forward only the caller's explicit flag; absent/false still leaves the original confirmation in place.

Testing

Base: 252e5193902d466726da9af75047dfffff2ae662. Debian 12 Linux aarch64 in a nonroot disposable container, Python 3.11. The full existing smoke exits 0 with eight pre-existing optional research/hardware skips, explicitly not counted as passes. No Windows run or GPU/real-model benchmark is claimed.

The same final test files fail against unchanged production; the corrected branch gives:

Focused: 4 passed in 0.07s
Full applicable suite: 8 SKIPPED (a skip is not a pass):
all green
python tests/smoke.py
ruff check quantprobe
ruff format --check quantprobe
# Bandit medium-severity checks on changed package modules
git diff --check

All applicable commands above exited 0 locally. The snapshot is a complete upstream checkout plus this branch's exact changed-file bytes; no test is a copied production-function reimplementation. External I/O is mocked where stated. Dependencies and lockfiles are unchanged.

Security And Data Access

No credential, production-data, authentication, read-only guardrail or privileged workflow changes are included. Tests use synthetic inputs and disposable paths. No new benchmark, fitted law, or hardware capability is claimed.

Notes

The real CLI and custom orchestration are exercised with download/probe I/O mocked. This proves flag propagation, not a real model probe or a new consent policy. Probe thresholds and ordinary dry-run behavior are unchanged.

AI-assisted implementation, isolated same-provider source review, and controller regression checks are disclosed. They are not maintainer approval, cross-vendor certification, or hosted CI. One focused, signed-off commit; no generated logs, personal config, model weights or worktree state is included.

Draft pending upstream CI and maintainer review. Companion changes touching the same module/test hook may require rebasing as they land; no combined branch is being submitted.

Address FedericoTs#13 with focused regression coverage.

AI-assisted implementation and isolated source review; exact validation and remaining platform limitations are recorded in the draft PR.

Signed-off-by: Divyam Talwar <divyamtalwar0@gmail.com>
@DivyamTalwar
DivyamTalwar marked this pull request as ready for review September 19, 2026 22:01

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

auto --custom --yes loses the confirmation flag before its probe step

1 participant