[chaitanyagiri]

Morning run, day 34 (31 Oct 2026). Daily brief only: 6 engine PRs are open, so no new pages under the run rule.

Page

• agent-tools-today-2026-10-31 (daily brief, 1,189 words, one scene). It opens with a "Check this first" section on the tampered Claude Code extension in Cursor's marketplace (versions 2.1.312 and 2.1.313 for Windows and macOS, per Cursor's notice updated 30 Oct), with how to check, how to clean up and what Cursor and Anthropic each say. Then Mika, nesformer and Google's sleep framework; Unslop, Floorplan and pixelfx; Claude Code 2.1.316, OpenCode 2.2.3 to 2.2.5 and Paradev Desktop 2.0.2; DeepTutor, T3 Code and OpenBot; Northflank, the Y Combinator agent runs and the SigNoz post.

Time sensitive: the security section is most useful merged soon. It also needs a recheck if Cursor updates its notice again.

Checks

• gate.mjs with media and motion: PASS.
• Independent fact review: FAIL on 9 points (who found it, impact, the check's scope, safe cleanup, what each side says, nesformer, sleep framework, Northflank attribution, OpenCode source). All fixed as written, then trimmed to fit the 1,200 word limit. Gate rerun. The fixes were not sent back through a second review.
• npm run build: passed.
• Scene: the still and timeline frames were checked. Tap animation in a real browser was not confirmed, because headless Chrome barely ran animation frames.

Evidence (branch evidence/day-34-am)

Page	Before	After
agent-tools-today-2026-10-31	new

Scene still:

The media.json entry sits mid file, away from the hunks of the six open engine PRs. No indexing requests. OpenSEO is signed out, so there was no learn step, METRICS row or index watch. The brief has no scout reports: the 30 Oct evening run was skipped on battery, so AgentG and AgentX were not asked, and it says we did not read X or Reddit.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[github-actions]

🚫 This PR is missing its before/after evidence

You attached something, but not one under each heading. Both are required, and they have to sit under their own heading so a reviewer can tell which is which.

• Before — no image or video under that heading
• After — no image or video under that heading

How to fix it: edit the description, keep the ### Before and ### After headings from the template, and drag an image or video under each. GitHub uploads it inline. This check re-runs the moment you save.

A bug fix with no visible surface still needs it: show the failing behaviour, then the same steps passing. A terminal recording is fine.

Genuinely nothing to show — a CI tweak, a typo, a dependency bump? A maintainer can apply the no-visual-change label. Please don't ask unless it truly has no observable effect.

📖 CONTRIBUTING.md → Evidence is mandatory