chore(deps): bump nixpkgs from 9fbb54b to ef34387

[dependabot]

Bumps nixpkgs from 9fbb54b to ef34387.

Commits

• ef34387 zerofs: 2.3.0 -> 2.3.3 (#558798)
• c1428a5 unsloth-desktop: add updateScript, fix runtime gaps; 0.1.804-beta -> 0.1.806-...
• 6b4a11e lmstudio-bionic: init at 1.1.1-5 (#543744)
• ac9c75c python3Packages.iamdata: 0.1.202609121 -> 0.1.202609131 (#562784)
• 8749cda cdncheck: 1.2.51 -> 1.3.1 (#562785)
• eda9f08 exploitdb: 2026-09-04 -> 2026-09-12 (#562786)
• f75a30a snac2: 2.94 -> 2.95 (#562684)
• 8ae95e7 cdncheck: 1.2.51 -> 1.3.1
• 7998925 exploitdb: 2026-09-04 -> 2026-09-12
• 5a66f20 python3Packages.iamdata: 0.1.202609121 -> 0.1.202609131
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[github-actions]

Thanks @dependabot[bot] for taking the time to contribute.

This repository is observing a maintainer-managed PR intake gate in dry-run mode, so this pull request is staying open. This note helps maintainers prepare the allowlist before any enforcement is considered.

Please read CONTRIBUTING.md for the expected contribution shape. A maintainer can grant recurring PR access by commenting /lgtm on a pull request.

[Hmbown]

Brought this branch up to date with main (green since ccbef2c) so CI runs against a base that passes; the earlier red lanes were inherited from the red main this PR was opened on. Merging once the re-run is green.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

Claude finished @Hmbown's task in 22s —— View job

---

Review: PR #6360 — chore(deps): bump nixpkgs from 9fbb54b to ef34387

• Gather context (dependabot nixpkgs bump, flake.lock only)
• Review diff for correctness/safety/reuse/tests/security
• Post findings

Diff scope: flake.lock only (+3/-3) — a routine input pin bump for the nixpkgs flake input, rev 9fbb54b → ef34387 (lastModified/narHash updated accordingly). No flake.nix, Rust source, or other files changed.

Findings: None. This is a mechanical lockfile update with no logic, provider/model/route, reuse, or security surface to review — the five review categories in the task instructions don't apply to a pure input-hash bump.

One general note (not a defect in this diff): a nixpkgs bump can still shift package versions/toolchains used by the flake's dev shell or build. If CI has a Nix build/flake-check job, it's the right signal here rather than manual review of this file; I did not run nix flake check myself since that requires network/Nix tooling not available in this review environment.

[devin-ai-integration]

✅ Devin Review: No Issues Found

Devin Review analyzed this PR and found no bugs or issues to report.

[codewhale-agent]

Codewhale review did not run

codewhale review --pr 6360 (provider: deepseek) could not reach the model: Review pass 1/1 request failed: Responses API request failed: LLM error: HTTP 402: Insufficient Balance; no partial review was accepted or posted; publication: n.
This is a provider funding/config problem, not a finding about this PR. The check stays advisory; a maintainer with secret access needs to fund or rotate the review key (see .github/workflows/codewhale-review.yml). Re-run the workflow after that.