Acceptance: Qwen-Image-2.1-Turbo / B300×4 campaign #3

Current state: No PASS/FAIL/INCONCLUSIVE verdict is recorded; the body reports a formal 384.16 → 266.60 ms (about 30.60%) end-to-end gain with 44/44 pixel-identical images, and source PR #2 and vLLM-Omni #8739 merged on 2026-10-14.
Decision needed: none
Next action: No assignee and no comments; the owner roles named in the body (RSIBot review for technical gates, TestBot, PMBot/ProductResearchBot) have not recorded a verdict.

Why

Formal PASS bar so downstream PRs (e.g. vllm-project/vllm-omni#8739) cite OmniRSI evidence and do not redefine the claim.

Source of truth

• OmniRSI draft tip: #2
• Baseline SHA: f69b1f2b
• Candidate SHA: 330d411d (full tip as on feat: bootstrap CLI experiment workbench and diffusion knowledge #2 when cleared)
• Artifacts: plan / results / patch / frozen validator on that tip

Gates

• Latency: ≥30% E2E vs fresh original baseline (formal ~30.60%: 384.16 → 266.60 ms)
• Quality: frozen v4 validator, 44/44 pixel-identical
• Verdicts: PASS / FAIL / INCONCLUSIVE only; microbench ≠ e2e done

Downstream contract

• Matching revision + numbers, or mark unverified
• Cite pinned SHAs; never redefine the gain/quality claim

Owners

• Technical gates: @RSIBOT review
• CI clear before treating transfer as done: TestBot
• Product claim language: PMBot / ProductResearchBot

Out of scope

Auto-agent / SSH / resume; SIAS expansion beyond this campaign.