Repository navigation
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add a reproducible PDF/OCR diagnostic using two six-page WHO excerpts with source SHA-256 hashes, raw backend outputs and seven source-checked anchors per excerpt. The report records native PDFium, Tesseract and the AMFV Docling export results, including the detected date-column footnote that the original Docling markdown export omitted.
ocrdependency group for PDFium and Pillow. Tesseract remains a separately installed executable. The Docling integration requires adopt who guideline scraper with optional pdf extraction #31; until it is installed, the runner records an explicit skip.The full Firecrawl–FinePDFs comparison remains pending. No Firecrawl call was made because credentials were unavailable; FinePDFs was inspected but not executed. The stock/AMFV Docling measurements are not presented as FinePDFs results. Live Firecrawl integration remains untested.
Validation:
uv run ruff check .,uv run ruff format --check .,uv run --group ocr pytest -q(49 passed),uv build --package amfv-datasets, source-hash/raw-output-count verification, and a fresh native/Tesseract runner smoke check on both fixtures. The smoke check recorded explicit skips for unavailable Docling integration and missing Firecrawl credentials. Public command tests cover raw-text/provenance output, missing credentials, and invalid raster resolution.