Repository navigation
docs: state what ACCEPT requires since the multi-quantity fix - #44
Merged
Merged
Conversation
SKILL.md and AGENT_USAGE.md still described ACCEPT only as abstract-level support, so an agent reading them could not tell that a claim with one wrong number among several is now WARN. The "judge from the sentence, even under ACCEPT" step is unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
SKILL.md and AGENT_USAGE.md still described
ACCEPTonly as abstract-level support. Since #43,check-claimaccepts a claim only when every number in it, with its unit, sign, and direction, is supported by the same abstract sentence. An agent reading the docs could not tell that one wrong number among several now makes the claimWARN.ACCEPTis abstract-level evidence only." (the sentencetests/test_skill_docs.pychecks), one sentence states the rule, including that one unsupported number blocksACCEPTeven when another number matches. Nothing is weakened: the sweep step "different value, unit, or direction → the manuscript misstates the paper, even underACCEPT" stays as it is, because the engine still cannot tell two numbers apart when they are swapped inside one sentence.Docs only.
PYTHONPATH=src python -m unittest discover -s tests: 392 OK.🤖 Generated with Claude Code