Pytest cov and contribution statement

[raederan]

Should be fulfill all acceptance criteria #23

[github-actions]

📊 Benchmark Results

Click to see benchmark comparison

📊 Benchmark Comparison (threshold: 1.3x)
============================================================

➖ Unchanged (within threshold):
  ➖ test_simple_dict_document_store: 0.0017s → 0.0017s (+1.0%)
  ➖ test_sqlite_document_store: 0.0018s → 0.0019s (+0.7%)
  ➖ test_local_sparql_store: 0.0403s → 0.0381s (-5.5%)
  ➖ test_oneof_subschema: 0.0596s → 0.0605s (+1.5%)
  ➖ test_enum_docstrings: 0.0502s → 0.0518s (+3.1%)
  ➖ test_subclass_inheritance: 0.0545s → 0.0546s (+0.3%)
  ➖ test_class_hierarchy: 0.0515s → 0.0518s (+0.5%)
  ➖ test_core[v1]: 0.0386s → 0.0394s (+2.2%)
  ➖ test_core[v2]: 0.0446s → 0.0450s (+1.0%)
  ➖ test_schema_generation[v1]: 0.0017s → 0.0017s (-1.2%)
  ➖ test_schema_generation[v2]: 0.0028s → 0.0028s (-0.2%)
  ➖ test_simple_json: 0.0007s → 0.0007s (-1.3%)
  ➖ test_complex_graph: 0.0016s → 0.0016s (+0.3%)

============================================================
Summary: 0 regressions, 0 improvements, 13 unchanged
============================================================

✅ No significant performance regressions

Threshold: 1.3x (30% slower triggers a regression warning)

Note: Benchmarks are informational only and won't fail the build.

_{💡 Tip: Download the benchmark-results artifact for detailed JSON data}

[codecov]

Welcome to Codecov 🎉

Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests.

ℹ️ You can also turn on project coverage checks and project coverage reporting on Pull Request comment

Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️

[github-actions]

📊 Benchmark Results

Click to see benchmark comparison

📊 Benchmark Comparison (threshold: 1.3x)
============================================================

➖ Unchanged (within threshold):
  ➖ test_simple_dict_document_store: 0.0016s → 0.0016s (-0.6%)
  ➖ test_sqlite_document_store: 0.0017s → 0.0017s (-0.3%)
  ➖ test_local_sparql_store: 0.0378s → 0.0389s (+2.9%)
  ➖ test_oneof_subschema: 0.0562s → 0.0582s (+3.5%)
  ➖ test_enum_docstrings: 0.0478s → 0.0495s (+3.4%)
  ➖ test_subclass_inheritance: 0.0516s → 0.0519s (+0.6%)
  ➖ test_class_hierarchy: 0.0486s → 0.0493s (+1.5%)
  ➖ test_core[v1]: 0.0363s → 0.0369s (+1.7%)
  ➖ test_core[v2]: 0.0415s → 0.0426s (+2.7%)
  ➖ test_schema_generation[v1]: 0.0015s → 0.0015s (-0.4%)
  ➖ test_schema_generation[v2]: 0.0027s → 0.0027s (+0.0%)
  ➖ test_simple_json: 0.0006s → 0.0006s (-1.6%)
  ➖ test_complex_graph: 0.0015s → 0.0015s (-0.8%)

============================================================
Summary: 0 regressions, 0 improvements, 13 unchanged
============================================================

✅ No significant performance regressions

Threshold: 1.3x (30% slower triggers a regression warning)

Note: Benchmarks are informational only and won't fail the build.

_{💡 Tip: Download the benchmark-results artifact for detailed JSON data}