Skip to content

chore: addition haiku 5.5 to vertex and bedrock - #977

Merged
whysumedh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
haiku/5.5
Oct 7, 2026
Merged

whysumedh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
haiku/5.5

Conversation

@whysumedh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 7, 2026 23:10

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔵 Needs a closer look

The new rates and Vertex AI context thresholds require confirmation against authoritative provider pricing.

0 open findings

What changed in this PR

Adds Claude Haiku 5.5 to the Vertex AI and Bedrock pricing catalogs.

Changes:

  • Adds Vertex AI aliases with regional, batch, caching, and 100k-token context-tier pricing.
  • Adds Bedrock base, global, and regional model variants with standard, batch, and caching rates.
File Description
pricing/​vertex-ai.json Adds Haiku 5.5 aliases and tiered regional pricing.
pricing/​bedrock.json Adds Haiku 5.5 pricing for six model variants.

🧠 Review effort: Balanced


💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 7, 2026 23:15

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔵 Needs a closer look

Provider pricing, context thresholds, and supported parameters require authoritative confirmation before approval.

0 open findings

🧠 Review effort: Balanced

naresh4dev

This comment was marked as resolved.

naresh4dev

This comment was marked as resolved.

@naresh4dev naresh4dev left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Revised Review: Approve ✅

After properly fetching the branch and comparing the actual JSON structures against main, I can confirm this PR is clean and correct. My earlier review had multiple errors from misreading the diff — apologies for the noise.

What the PR actually does

Purely additive — 15 new keys, 0 modifications, 0 deletions:

File Keys added
general/bedrock.json 6 entries (anthropic/us/au/jp/eu/global)
general/vertex-ai.json 1 entry (anthropic.)
pricing/bedrock.json 6 entries (anthropic/us/au/jp/eu/global)
pricing/vertex-ai.json 2 entries (anthropic. + non-prefixed)

Pricing verification: 176/176 ✅

All prices verified against Anthropic direct pricing:

Base (lte-100k): $0.10 input · $0.50 output · $0.01 cache read · $0.125 cache write · $0.20 cache write 1h

Check Count Status
Bedrock base (anthropic. + global.) 14 ✅
Bedrock regional (us/au/jp/eu = 1.1×) 28 ✅
Vertex default (lte-100k + gt-100k at 5×) 14 ✅
Vertex regional (us/eu = 1.1×) 28 ✅
All batch configs (50%) 92 ✅
Total 176 ✅

General config verification ✅

  • Vertex: Matches existing anthropic.claude-sonnet-5-5 exactly (enabled/disabled thinking, budget_tokens)
  • Bedrock: Matches existing anthropic.claude-opus-5-5 exactly (adaptive thinking, output_config.effort, display, tool_choice) — this is the correct Bedrock pattern for 5.5 models
  • All 6 bedrock general entries are identical ✅
  • type.primary: chat, supported: [image, tools], removes temperature/top_p/top_k ✅

Minor notes (non-blocking)

  • No PR description — would be nice to add source links for future reference
  • Haiku 5.5 not yet on AWS/GCP pricing pages — derived from Anthropic direct pricing, which is standard practice
  • Bedrock context tier: no context_tier_map (flat pricing), which is correct since Bedrock doesn't have the 100k long-context surcharge that Vertex does

@whysumedh
whysumedh merged commit 3da190b into main Oct 7, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants