Skip to content

fix readme file #32

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
kritisubedi1 merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2026
Merged

fix readme file #32

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
15 changes: 9 additions & 6 deletions TESTING_README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ Executed via `pytest` (`app/tests`):
Unit test command:

```zsh
PYTHONPATH=/Users/kriti/Review-1/app /Users/kriti/Review-1/.venv/bin/python -m pytest -q app/tests
PYTHONPATH=app python -m pytest -q app/tests
```

Result: **106 passed**.
Expand All @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ Performed via API negative checks:
Command:

```zsh
PYTHONPATH=/Users/kriti/Review-1/app /Users/kriti/Review-1/.venv/bin/python app/tests/run_additional_checks.py
PYTHONPATH=app python app/tests/run_additional_checks.py
```

#### 3.3.2 Performance (Lightweight Local)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ Overall outcome:
## 5. Test Metrics and Summary

- Requirement coverage (executed subset): high for core API + validation + ML inference path.
- Code coverage (latest measured run): `app/backend/app.py` 100%, `app/ml/predict.py` 100%, training modules 100%, overall measured total 100%.
-Code coverage (latest measured run): app/backend/app.py ~100%, app/ml/predict.py ~100%, training modules ~100%. High code coverage achieved for core modules (approx. 90–100%).
- Coverage note: training pipeline modules are now included in automated tests.
- Defect density (executed suites): low (no functional failures).
- Automated vs manual: predominantly automated.
Expand All @@ -252,22 +252,25 @@ Overall outcome:

---

> Run commands from project root directory

## Commands Reference

### Unit + regression tests

```zsh
PYTHONPATH=/Users/kriti/Review-1/app /Users/kriti/Review-1/.venv/bin/python -m pytest -q app/tests
PYTHONPATH=app python -m pytest -q app/tests
```

### Additional integration + security + perf checks

```zsh
PYTHONPATH=/Users/kriti/Review-1/app /Users/kriti/Review-1/.venv/bin/python app/tests/run_additional_checks.py
PYTHONPATH=app python app/tests/run_additional_checks.py
```

### Coverage run
> Run from project root directory after activating virtual environment

```zsh
PYTHONPATH=/Users/kriti/Review-1/app /Users/kriti/Review-1/.venv/bin/python -m pytest -q app/tests --cov=app/backend --cov=app/ml --cov-report=term-missing
PYTHONPATH=app python -m pytest app/tests --cov=app/backend --cov=app/ml --cov-report=term-missing
```
Loading