Skip to content

Naming lists: view browser as used in practice (Phase > Set > numbered type > family) - #74

Merged
SamuelAB merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
claude/project-thread-gvkxa2
Oct 28, 2026
Merged

SamuelAB merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
claude/project-thread-gvkxa2

Conversation

@SamuelAB

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Requested by Sam · project thread

What changes

Matches the views standard to Sam's working project browser (screenshots in the thread):

  • Browser Views (Phase-Set-Type-Family): Phase > OB_ViewSet (full-word folders such as CONSTRUCTION) > OB_ViewType (numbered: 000-AXO, 010-PLAN, 017-RCP-LIGHT, 200-SECT…) > Revit view family.
  • New shared parameter OB_ViewType (group 01); OB_ViewSet now holds the folder name.
  • View names <PHASE>-<SET>-<TYPE>-<Level> (N-CON-PLAN-EGRESS-L02), -OPT1/-OPT2 for options, phases EX, N, P1, P2; Z-WIP next to Z-USER-<NAME>.
  • ??? explained: drafting views have no phase; inside a phase it marks unfiled views. DRAFT- names for drafting views proposed.

Checks run

  • names/build_names.py --check, crawl_app.js (0 without French), check_i18n.py --app --strict (0 errors); headless browser: no page errors, no horizontal scroll at 390 px.

Generated by Claude Code

…in practice

Drawing set folders in full words with short codes in names; numbered
view types (000-AXO, 010-PLAN, 200-SECT...) in a new shared parameter
OB_ViewType; level last in view names with -OPTn for options; P1/P2
phases; Z-WIP and Z-TUTORIAL sets; ??? explained as the unfiled folder.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PYjDnENavg8joCDbzpsT6c
…orial set

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PYjDnENavg8joCDbzpsT6c
@SamuelAB SamuelAB self-assigned this Oct 28, 2026
@SamuelAB
SamuelAB merged commit d9c74d7 into main Oct 28, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants