Skip to content

[codex] Add Pathfinder dialog outcomes#27

Merged
trek-e merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/pathfinder-dialog-outcomes
Jun 16, 2026
Merged

[codex] Add Pathfinder dialog outcomes#27
trek-e merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/pathfinder-dialog-outcomes

Conversation

@trek-e

@trek-e trek-e commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • add a typed Pathfinder player dialog outcome vocabulary for renderable text vs explicit suppressed responses
  • route dialog answer consumption and player cancel handling through dialog outcomes instead of blank-string suppression
  • keep legacy dialog text wrappers for direct callers while documenting the new outcome contract
  • update dialog/router/player adapter tests to cover the explicit suppressed response path

Validation

  • uv run ruff check CONTEXT.md interfaces/discord/pathfinder_player_dialog_outcome.py interfaces/discord/pathfinder_player_dialog.py interfaces/discord/dialog_router.py interfaces/discord/discord_router_bridge.py interfaces/discord/pathfinder_player_adapter.py interfaces/discord/response_renderer.py interfaces/discord/tests/test_dialog_router.py interfaces/discord/tests/test_phase38_integration.py
  • cd interfaces/discord && uv run pytest tests/test_dialog_router.py tests/test_phase38_integration.py tests/test_pathfinder_player_dialog.py tests/test_response_renderer.py
  • cd interfaces/discord && uv run pytest tests/test_pathfinder_player_adapter.py
  • cd interfaces/discord && uv run pytest

Notes

  • no uv.lock files changed in this branch

@trek-e trek-e merged commit 7d3b9a6 into main Jun 16, 2026
2 checks passed
@trek-e trek-e deleted the codex/pathfinder-dialog-outcomes branch June 16, 2026 01:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant