Skip to content

[Eval] Qualify Open-Jev 9B/27B on the text reference path and one browser suite #103

Open

Description

@Birfy

Why

Roadmap tracker #54 still has an unchecked model-backend item: Qualify Open-Jev 9B/27B on the text reference path and browser suite through the existing local System One endpoint; record the actual served checkpoint rather than inferring it from the adapter name.

There is no dedicated issue for that work. #88 / PR #101 cover served OneJev multimodal (System One + media), which is a different checkpoint family and path. docs/capabilities.md already records Open-Jev-9B timeout / BLOCKED evidence on Google Flights ticks (Agents 22e685b, Omni 4a79980) and notes Open-Jev-27B-v1.1 did not fit an A40 — that is request-path evidence, not task success or a ticket-router baseline.

Industry context: TypeSafe's System One / Jev stack remains the hosted reference (Introducing System One Models & Jev); local Open-Jev is how self-hosted deployments match that interface without TypeSafe keys. A clean qualification unblocks the Agents capability matrix row and stops people reading adapter names as checkpoint proof.

Proposed scope (one PR of evidence + docs)

  1. Pin exact Hugging Face (or Omni worker) revisions for Open-Jev-9B and, if hardware allows, Open-Jev-27B; refuse to claim a size that did not load.
  2. Text reference path: run the existing ticket-router (or the public231 / decide probe already in-tree) through the generic Jev HTTP adapter → Omni Open-Jev worker; record accuracy, validity, p50/p95 latency, cost if any, and raw request/response samples under docs/results/.
  3. One browser suite slice (prefer a fixture from #13 if ready; otherwise the deterministic local search / Flights shaping path already used for Laya): completion denominator that counts failures and timeouts, decision latency, and failure reasons.
  4. Update the Open-Jev row(s) in docs/capabilities.md and tick the matching checkbox on [Tracking] Roadmap: applications, benchmarks, model backends and System1-Omni #54 — mark untested combinations explicitly (e.g. 27B if OOM).

Acceptance criteria

Out of scope

References

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions