Skip to content

docs(conversion): list the playback pixel tracker rewrite in the 3.3 to 3.2 rules (#1643) - #1814

Merged
bokelley merged 1 commit into
nextfrom
claude/issue-1643-conversion-docs
Nov 2, 2026
Merged

bokelley merged 1 commit into
nextfrom
claude/issue-1643-conversion-docs

Conversation

@bokelley

@bokelley bokelley commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow-up to #1800. The "3.3 → 3.2 semantic rules" table in docs/cross-version-conversion.md said playback pixel trackers "have their own rules" without stating them. This adds the row: a start / first_quartile / midpoint / third_quartile / complete tracker becomes event: custom with custom_event_name, recorded as playback_event_as_custom. It also notes that the 3.0 tracker_pixel shape drops these trackers, including the custom form. Docs only.

Refs #1643

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…to 3.2 rules (#1643)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@aao-secretariat aao-secretariat Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ladon verdict: Approve

Approve — docs-only change, no blocking findings.

This PR touches a single file (docs/cross-version-conversion.md, +4/-2) documenting the playback pixel-tracker rewrite in the 3.3→3.2 and 3.0 rules. The reviewer verified every claim against the implementation: the new playback_event_as_custom row matches _playback_tracker_as_custom and its loss record in compat/versions.py, and the 3.0 prose matches downgrade_pixel_tracker in canonical_formats/pixel_tracker.py. No wire shape, public export, or generated code touched.

No findings of any severity. high_risk is false, gated_paths is false, no author-team gate, no prior decision. None of decision rows 1–8 fire, so this falls through to row 9 → approve.

@bokelley
bokelley merged commit 7657ac7 into next Nov 2, 2026
33 checks passed
@bokelley
bokelley deleted the claude/issue-1643-conversion-docs branch November 2, 2026 03:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant