Skip to content
architsharmPublic

About

AgentFox: open-source control plane for AI agents. Guardrails on model traffic, tool calls bounded by capability grants, and a tamper-evident audit trail mapped to compliance frameworks.

Topics

Resources

Code of conduct

Contributing

Security policy

Stars

3 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Latest commit

 

History

887 Commits

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

AgentFox

Open-source guardrails and a tool-call firewall for AI agents.

AgentFox checks what your agent may read, may claim and may do, and refuses the rest. It contains prompt injection at the tool call, so it holds after the model has already been convinced. Works with OpenAI, Anthropic, LiteLLM, LangChain, LangGraph, MCP servers, Claude Code and Codex.

CI Licence Python PyPI Status Playground

▶ Try it live, no account  ·  🚀 Self-host it  ·  📊 Every benchmark  ·  ⚖ How we compare

Docs · Getting started · Architecture · Contributing · What is built · Discussions


Four tool calls from one agent. Three are allowed; payments.transfer is refused by capability.denied, with the reason shown.

What it does

AgentFox sits on your agent's model and tool calls, in-process or as an HTTP gateway, and decides whether each one may happen. Every tool carries a declared impact tier, every agent holds explicit capability grants with argument limits, and every argument carries the provenance of where its value came from. A transfer whose recipient came out of a retrieved document is refused because of where the value came from, not because a detector recognised the payload. Every decision lands in a tamper-evident audit chain that an auditor can verify without trusting us.

Question On by default
Read Is this person allowed to see this retrieved content? You call it from your retrieval code
Answer Is this inside what the agent knows? After you declare a knowledge boundary
Act Was this agent granted this call, with these values, from these sources? Yes: tool-containment ships enforcing

Quickstart

pip install agentfox
agentfox up

up scans the repository, then asks a few questions, each with a recommended answer: where AgentFox runs (this machine, your own server, or AgentFox Cloud), what to cover (Claude Code and Codex hooks, your Python agent, the gateway for any language, the tools and MCP servers it found, the GitHub Action, monitoring, compliance, the dashboard) and how strict to start. Then it does all of it in one pass, starting in observe so nothing is blocked until you say so. agentfox up --yes takes every recommended answer; run it again any time and it picks up where you left off.

To look around first instead:

agentfox init && agentfox demo

init creates a SQLite database and loads 43 controls and the policy packs, in about a second. demo runs a thirteen-step walkthrough in about five. Both are offline: no API key, no downloaded weights, no network egress. Or scan the directory you are in without installing:

curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/architsharm/agentfox/main/scripts/quickscan.sh | bash

To check the MCP servers and skills that Claude Code, Cursor, Claude Desktop, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI and Codex load on your machine, with no setup:

agentfox scan machine

On every pull request, the GitHub Action annotates lethal trifectas, ungoverned model calls and poisoned skills, and fails the check on the kinds you list in fail-on:

- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: architsharm/agentfox@main
  with:
    fail-on: trifecta,skills

Then govern your own agent with one line:

import agentfox
agentfox.auto()

Every OpenAI, Anthropic, LiteLLM and LangChain call in the process is traced, evaluated and audited, and every tool call in a response is checked before your code can run it. Nothing is blocked by the line itself: content policies start in observe, and tool containment enforces after agentfox init, raising agentfox.Blocked for a refused call.

Contain a tool call

Any language can ask the gateway about one call before running it:

agentfox serve                              # gateway + control-plane API on 127.0.0.1:8080
agentfox admin users create you@example.com --token   # first operator + API token, shown once

curl -s -X POST http://localhost:8080/v1/guard/tool_call \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $AGENTFOX_TOKEN" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"agent":"payments-ops","tool":"payments.transfer",
       "arguments":{"amount":250,"currency":"USD","to":"acct_991"},
       "provenance":{"to":"tool_result","amount":"user"},
       "intent":"refund a duplicate charge"}' | jq '{verdict, approval_id}'
{ "verdict": "escalate", "approval_id": "apr_01m376q43zby33tbsp" }

The recipient came from a tool result, so the transfer waits for a human. Flip "to" to "user" and the same call returns allow. Once a person approves it (agentfox permit approvals approve apr_…), the same call with "approval_id" added runs, once. Pointed at /v1 as an OpenAI or Anthropic base URL, the gateway proxies model calls too, and a held one returns HTTP 428 with its approval_id. LangGraph, MCP, Claude Code hooks, the SDK and the full command set are in the website guides and the product tour.

Tracking without anyone running a command

A scan is a snapshot. Connect a GitHub repository, a hosted API's OpenAPI document or an MCP server once and AgentFox keeps re-checking it: every few hours, and on every push once the GitHub webhook is registered. What changed since the last run becomes a finding, and the finding closes itself when the condition clears. Setup and every finding type: Monitor connected sources.

What we measured

We do not claim adversarial robustness, and we do not believe anyone can. The Attacker Moves Second (Nasr, Carlini, Schulhoff et al., 2025) reports over 90% attack success against twelve published defences once the attacker adapts. So the number we lead with does not depend on catching anything: both rows below were measured with every detector switched off.

Evidence Result
Containment under total detector bypass 8/8 attacks contained with zero detector signal; 4/4 legitimate calls still allowed
AgentDojo, replayed end to end: 97 user tasks and 949 attack pairs, with argument provenance inferred from the real tool outputs 588/588 attack pairs contained with session-level taint, but only 24/97 benign tasks (24.7% [17.2, 34.2]) run without escalating to a human. Per-argument taint: 37/97 benign tasks, 527/588 attack pairs contained. Taking provenance from the benchmark's own labels gives 97/97 and 588/588; that is an upper bound, not a measurement

The cost is benign utility: when provenance is inferred, a legitimate action that copies a value out of a tool output looks the same as an attack, and it is escalated.

Optionally, detection gets better. The judgment tiers are off by default; with them on, agentfox catches 160/165 of the injection payloads that defeated our own pattern detectors, at 94.7% precision against the NotInject over-defense set. What each tier is worth, and what it costs.

Where we are still improving

Detection is the layer we trust least, so we publish its numbers.

  • The default injection stack (heuristic plus the PIGuard classifier) has a held-out recall of 68.3%, at 100% precision (REPORT.md). It needs agentfox[classifiers] and the model weights, which the Docker image ships; without them the heuristic runs alone, and its held-out injection recall is 16.7%; the startup warning and agentfox doctor say so.
  • On NotInject, 339 benign prompts built to trip keyword guardrails, the classifier flags 11.5% (39/339) at the level an enforcing policy acts on (PIGuard alone), and 41% (139/339) counting the advisory backstop hits that observe mode records.
  • An adaptive attacker that reads our verdict and retries gets 74% of the attacks we catch through within 50 attempts, measured against the heuristic-only stack that was the default until October 2026.
  • The deterministic answerability classifier abstains on 57/676 contested questions; with a judgment tier that becomes 572/676, at the cost of over-refusal rising from 0.75% to 6.8%.
  • Against a real, independently installed llm-guard on indirect injection via tool output, it is more precise than us: 81.8% against our 66.7% on the same 20 cases, though of the 10 attacks among them we catch all 10 and it catches 9. That run predates October 2026, while the backstop model's hits still counted toward a block (agent_security).
  • On AgentDojo, per-argument taint misses 61 of 702 attacker write calls; session-level taint misses none of them and escalates three in four benign tasks.
  • The default stack reaches 86.4% and 98.4% recall on two independent datasets (SPML and yanismiraoui), but on long prompts (around 2,000 characters and up) the classifier mostly times out within its 250 ms budget and the request falls back to the heuristic.

Treat every detection number as a speed bump that raises attacker cost, never as a defence.

Not built yet

  • It is only as good as your declarations. A destructive tool declared read is treated as read. agentfox doctor grades this; agentfox scan finds undeclared tools.
  • You declare the estate yourself. No Okta, no DataHub; principals and grants live in AgentFox.
  • Compliance mappings are DRAFT, not reviewed by counsel, and labelled so in every export.
  • Version 0.3. No live IdP or SSO, single-org multi-tenancy enforced at the session, text only.

Live per-capability status, computed by probe: docs/status.md.

Documentation

Website docs Install, guides for every integration, and the CLI, API and config reference
Getting started A linear first hour, ending with your own agent governed
Product tour Every integration surface, commands by task, the demo output, self-hosting
ARCHITECTURE.md The domain model, a tool call traced through the code, and the code map
CONTRIBUTING.md Setup in three commands, just ci, and the conventions
docs/ Design, threat model, requirements and how the numbers were measured
Benchmarks Every number above, with the script that reproduces it
SECURITY.md Report a vulnerability privately; please not in a public issue

Questions and ideas go to Discussions; bugs to Issues. New contributors: start with a good first issue.

Licence

The open core is Apache-2.0: the SDKs, the gateway and CLI, enforcement and containment, every detector and validator, custom rules, policy packs, the benchmarks and the dashboard. It runs on its own, with no licence key and no limit on agents.

AgentFox Enterprise (ee/) adds what an organisation needs to govern many agents and prove it: compliance status against EU AI Act, ISO 42001, SOC 2 and NIST AI RMF, auditor evidence packages, fleet monitoring with alerts, and checks against your own access control. It is source-available under the Business Source License 1.1: free in production for one workspace with up to four agents, and each release becomes Apache-2.0 three years after it ships. It is included on AgentFox Cloud.

About

AgentFox: open-source control plane for AI agents. Guardrails on model traffic, tool calls bounded by capability grants, and a tamper-evident audit trail mapped to compliance frameworks.

Topics

Resources

Code of conduct

Contributing

Security policy

Stars

3 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages