An infinite base has its whole powers, and surjectivity is decided through the image - #1445
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…rough the image (-oo)^3 was NaN -- a claim that the value does not exist -- and so were (-oo)^2 and (-oo)^(-1), while (+oo)^2 was +oo: the finite-base arms of Pow did not apply and the polar form had nothing to say. They are the extended reals' powers now, by parity for -oo and 0 for a negative exponent, so the image of (-oo; +oo) under a cube is (-oo; +oo), and the reals are read as that interval where a family's image is computed. With it, forall b in B : exists a in A : f(a) = b -- surjectivity onto B, Def 7.4.1 of the reference of #1409 -- is decided as B lying in the image of A under f, where that image evaluates: the cube is onto RR, the square is not and is onto [0; +oo), the exponential is onto (0; +oo), doubling is not onto ZZ. Item 6's remaining analytic row. #1409 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012sonx8iAspMiwRwokT1Ura
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Item 6's remaining analytic row — surjectivity — and a
NaNon the way.(-oo)^3wasNaN, and so were(-oo)^2and(-oo)^(-1), while(+oo)^2was+oo:Pow's finite-base arms did not apply to an infinite base and the polar form had nothing to say.NaNis a claim that the value does not exist, and these exist in the extended reals:-oo,+oo(by the parity of the exponent) and0for a negative one. The image of(-oo; +oo)under a cube is then(-oo; +oo), andRRis read as that interval where a family's image is computed (image(x^3, x in RR)is(-oo; +oo)).Surjectivity.
forall b in B : exists a in A : f(a) = b(Def 7.4.1) is the statement thatBlies in the image ofAunderf, and the quantifier decision now puts it to the subset decision (#1432) with the image (#1442) where that image evaluates:forall b in RR : exists a in RR : a^3 = bTrueforall b in RR : exists a in RR : a^2 = bFalse(the witness route had it)forall b in [0; +oo) : exists a in RR : a^2 = bTrueforall b in (0; +oo) : exists a in RR : e^a = bTrue; ontoRR:Falseforall b in ZZ : exists a in ZZ : 2 a = bFalseforall b in {1, 4, 9} : exists a in {1, 2, 3} : a^2 = bTrue; with16inB:FalseSurjectivityTest, 15 rows. BREAKING-CHANGES.md rows measured on a v2.5.0 build (NaNthere). Full suite 12247 passed, 0 failed; benchmark gate PASSED.Part of #1409.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_012sonx8iAspMiwRwokT1Ura