A parent is never due before its children - #1626
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The two rules Happypig375 set on #718: a parent issue's milestone is never earlier than any child's, in the order the versions run and then Future and Guiding principles, so a child moved later takes its parent with it; and "under" is GitHub's sub-issue relationship, set in the turn an issue is filed, before any comment says it. With the command that sets the link, which takes the child's id rather than its number. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012sonx8iAspMiwRwokT1Ura
Happypig375's answer on #718 an hour later: the in-progress children move to the next minor and take their parent with them, and #718 is on Guiding principles. The example of #233 going to 2.8 described a state that no longer holds, so the paragraph says the rule both ways instead. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012sonx8iAspMiwRwokT1Ura
Member
|
It's really just scheduling. We need calculus to be completed earlier because it's the door to university level mathematics and beyond. |
Happypig375 on #1626: "It's really just scheduling. We need calculus to be completed earlier because it's the door to university level mathematics and beyond." The previous revision read his move of the integration work to 2.6 as a second direction of the rule. It is not: a child delayed beyond its parent moves the parent, and bringing work earlier is a decision with its own reason, which the paragraph now gives as his. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012sonx8iAspMiwRwokT1Ura
Member
Author
|
Thanks, I had read the move as a second direction of the rule. It now runs one way only: a child delayed beyond its parent moves the parent. Bringing the integration work to 2.6.0 is recorded as your scheduling decision, calculus first, with your reason (d6c10b6). |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The two rules from #718 (comments 5910315961 and 5910345918), written into AGENTS.md's milestone section:
Audited 2026-09-30: every open parent (#233, #718, #1469, #1501, #1540) now holds.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_012sonx8iAspMiwRwokT1Ura