Skip to content

chore: release main - #64

Open
cachekit-release-bot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
release-please--branches--main
Open

cachekit-release-bot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
release-please--branches--main

Conversation

@cachekit-release-bot

@cachekit-release-bot cachekit-release-bot Bot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🤖 I have created a release beep boop

cachekit-macros: 0.8.0

0.8.0 (2026-09-19)

Miscellaneous

  • cachekit-macros: Synchronize cachekit-rs versions
cachekit-rs: 0.8.0

0.8.0 (2026-09-19)

Features

  • encryption: keyring rotation — previous_master_keys + sequential decrypt (LAB-686) (#63) (8b9e7ac)
  • rs: surface rotation drain signal via decrypt_indexed (LAB-1678) (#74) (15b94cf)

Bug Fixes

  • cachekitio: reject reserved cache-key segments in request path (LAB-2878) (#76) (0ed7e1d)
  • serializer: own the msgpack decode depth bound and add a structural walk (LAB-2503) (#73) (306c1b1)

Dependencies

  • The following workspace dependencies were updated
    • dependencies
      • cachekit-macros bumped from 0.7.0 to 0.8.0

This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.

Release: cachekit-rs v0.8.0 and cachekit-macros v0.8.0

This is an automated release PR generated by release-please that bumps both workspace crates to version 0.8.0 and updates their changelogs.

Version Bumps

  • cachekit-rs: 0.7.00.8.0
  • cachekit-macros: 0.7.00.8.0
  • Updated the internal cachekit-macros dependency reference in cachekit-rs to 0.8.0 to keep workspace versions in sync.

Changes Included in cachekit-rs 0.8.0

Features

Bug Fixes

Dependencies

  • Bumped cachekit-macros from 0.7.0 to 0.8.0.

Changes Included in cachekit-macros 0.8.0

  • Version synchronized with the rest of the cachekit-rs workspace (no functional changes).

@kodus-27b

This comment has been minimized.

kodus-27b[bot]
kodus-27b Bot previously approved these changes Aug 8, 2026
@kodus-27b

This comment has been minimized.

kodus-27b[bot]
kodus-27b Bot previously approved these changes Sep 4, 2026
@kodus-27b

This comment has been minimized.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: cachekit-io/cachekit-rs/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 9e360bca-998f-441b-9fd0-4ae80544a1bd

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

kodus-27b[bot]
kodus-27b Bot previously approved these changes Sep 11, 2026
@kodus-27b

This comment has been minimized.

kodus-27b[bot]
kodus-27b Bot previously approved these changes Sep 13, 2026
@kodus-27b

This comment has been minimized.

@cachekit-release-bot
cachekit-release-bot Bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main branch from 471771b to a8f39ad Compare September 19, 2026 13:04
@kodus-27b

kodus-27b Bot commented Sep 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Kody Review Complete

Great news! 🎉
No issues were found that match your current review configurations.

Keep up the excellent work! 🚀

Kody Guide: Usage and Configuration
Interacting with Kody
  • Request a Review: Ask Kody to review your PR manually by adding a comment with the @kody start-review command at the root of your PR.

  • Validate Business Logic: Ask Kody to validate your code against business rules by adding a comment with the @kody -v business-logic command.

  • Provide Feedback: Help Kody learn and improve by reacting to its comments with a 👍 for helpful suggestions or a 👎 if improvements are needed.

Current Kody Configuration
Review Options

The following review options are enabled or disabled:

Options Enabled
Bug
Performance
Security
Business Logic

Access your configuration settings here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant