Repository navigation
docs: split slice design approaches into content, function and tier - #90
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
lczyk
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 24, 2026 14:42
explain when to use standard (regular installation behaviour) vs core with function slices (to minimise root filesystem footprint).
upils
requested changes
Sep 25, 2026
…approaches-update # Conflicts: # docs/explanation/slice-design-approaches.md
asanvaq
requested changes
Sep 25, 2026
asanvaq
left a comment
asanvaq
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi! Thank you so much! This has greatly improved this page. I added a few comments, I look forward to hearing your thoughts!
Co-authored-by: Anna Sancho Vaquer <anna.sanchovaquer@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Marcin Konowalczyk <marcin.konowalczyk@canonical.com>
upils
requested changes
Sep 28, 2026
asanvaq
requested changes
Oct 14, 2026
asanvaq
left a comment
asanvaq
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Last suggestions before I can approve it. The first one is a nit, the second one fixes the syntax of the note.
Co-authored-by: Anna Sancho Vaquer <anna.sanchovaquer@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Marcin Konowalczyk <marcin.konowalczyk@canonical.com>
Co-authored-by: Anna Sancho Vaquer <anna.sanchovaquer@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Marcin Konowalczyk <marcin.konowalczyk@canonical.com>
alesancor1
reviewed
Oct 15, 2026
alesancor1
left a comment
alesancor1
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM overall, just a couple of things - not really enough to block the merge so just commenting
Clarify the relationship between slice tiers and their dependencies. Signed-off-by: Marcin Konowalczyk <marcin.konowalczyk@canonical.com>
alesancor1
approved these changes
Oct 16, 2026
alesancor1
left a comment
alesancor1
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, thanks for the changes!
Contributor
|
Fixes #63 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
this splits "grouping by function" into two approaches: function (feature slices like
libpython3.12-stdlib_crypto,systemd_dbus-services) and tier (minimal/core/standard/
dev).