Fix synchronizer-ownership terminology in reassignment diagram - #1440
Open
8bitpal wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Fix synchronizer-ownership terminology in reassignment diagram#14408bitpal wants to merge 1 commit into
8bitpal wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Contracts are stored on validators, not synchronizers, so the sequence diagram note should describe assignment rather than implying a contract lives on a synchronizer. Signed-off-by: 8bitpal <elias@zerolimit.es>
8bitpal
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 21, 2026 10:29
Contributor
|
Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.
💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.