[armando-rodriguez-cko]

Summary
Updates the runtime dependencies to versions that fix the open security advisories: axios 1.20.0 and follow-redirects 1.16.1. The lockfile refresh also moves the development tooling to patched versions, and the build workflows are hardened.

Changes

• package.json: axios ^1.20.0; overrides follow-redirects ^1.16.1 and js-yaml ^4.3.2
• package-lock.json: refreshed; development tooling on patched versions (js-yaml, browserslist, brace-expansion, @humanfs/node, baseline-browser-mapping)
• .github/workflows/build-pull-request.yml, .github/workflows/build-master.yml: read-only contents permission and npm ci --ignore-scripts

npm audit --omit=dev reports no vulnerabilities. Unit tests and the build smoke test pass.

API Reference
None, no API surface change.

Breaking changes
None.

README
No change needed.

[agent-wall-e]

🔴 Risk Classification: MAJOR

Approval route: AI Review + Human Approval Required
Rollback controls: Change-freeze window + documented rollback plan

Classification reasons

• security_sensitive_path:.github/workflows/build-master.yml
• security_sensitive_path:.github/workflows/build-pull-request.yml

Operational gates

• ✅ jira_ticket (INT-1751)
• ✅ independent_review

Files analysed: 4

---

_{wall-e 2026.06.19-02 · policy 6b4ce2b3b45a…}

[agent-wall-e]

🔬 Debug — why this classification?

Each reason code emitted by the classifier, its source clause in the AI in SDLC Control Framework, and what it means.

Reason code	Kind	Clause	Meaning
security_sensitive_path — .github/workflows/build-master.yml	classifying	§2.1 M4/M5	Path matched a sensitive pattern (auth, secrets, crypto, PCI, migrations, network IaC).
security_sensitive_path — .github/workflows/build-pull-request.yml	classifying	§2.1 M4/M5	Path matched a sensitive pattern (auth, secrets, crypto, PCI, migrations, network IaC).

Kinds:

• classifying — this rule contributed to the chosen tier.
• informational — context only; did not by itself decide the tier.

See issue #3 for the proposal to formalise this map as Appendix A of the standards doc.

_{wall-e 2026.06.19-02 · debug}

[agent-wall-e]

🟢 Advisory review: Looks good to me

This PR still needs a human approval — wall-e cannot auto-approve it. For what it's worth, I read the diff and found nothing I'd block on.

Bumps axios to ^1.20.0, tightens follow-redirects and js-yaml overrides to patched versions, refreshes the lockfile, and hardens CI workflows with read-only permissions and --ignore-scripts. All changes match the stated intent and appear correct.

What I checked

• axios dependency correctly updated from ^1.18.0 to ^1.20.0 in package.json
• follow-redirects override tightened from ^1.16.0 to ^1.16.1 as claimed
• js-yaml override tightened from ^4.2.0 to ^4.3.2 as claimed
• contents: read permission added to both workflow files, limiting the GITHUB_TOKEN blast radius appropriately
• npm ci --ignore-scripts prevents postinstall script execution during CI, which is a sound hardening measure; worth confirming no required build-time scripts are skipped, but standard for a library like this
• Missing newline at end of build-master.yml is a minor pre-existing issue carried over in this diff, not introduced by this PR

---

_{This is not an approval. wall-e cannot auto-approve this PR — it is an opinion to help whoever does. Advisory review · us.anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-6 · wall-e 2026.06.19-02}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud