feat!: remove redundant id from coderd_agents_default_model and coderd_ai_model_price

[ethanndickson]

Both of these resources had a computed id that just repeated other attributes. On coderd_agents_default_model it was the organization ID, so plans showed the same UUID as organization_id, and on coderd_ai_model_price it was <provider_type>/<model>. Neither resource creates an object of its own in Coder, so there's no real ID to expose.

Breaking change for changelog:

coderd_agents_default_model and coderd_ai_model_price no longer have an id attribute. Use organization_id on coderd_agents_default_model, and provider_type and model on coderd_ai_model_price.

Existing state doesn't need migrating, as the framework drops the old id key when it reads state, and import IDs are unchanged. Both resources are experimental, so I think the break is fine.

I've also fixed the stale coderd_default_agents_model name in AGENTS.md.

[ethanndickson]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-06T06:51:08.853789Z	e6ee437	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Nice work!

Reviewed commit: e6ee437230

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[matifali]

Approving as it looks good. Don't have context on why it was added and why it is not used.

[ethanndickson]

Approving as it looks good. Don't have context on why it was added and why it is not used.

We needed it before we had organization_id, so you could import, and then I forgot to get rid of it when I added organization_id.