Skip to content

homepage: plainer wording for v12, checkpoints and the web UI - #86

Merged
nicolasbisurgi merged 2 commits into
cubewise-code:optimuspy2dot0from
nicolasbisurgi:homepage-v12-wording
Sep 29, 2026
Merged

nicolasbisurgi merged 2 commits into
cubewise-code:optimuspy2dot0from
nicolasbisurgi:homepage-v12-wording

Conversation

@nicolasbisurgi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landing page wording: it describes what OptimusPy does for the reader, not implementation details.

TM1 v12 section

  • The pill under the diagram reads "Two versions, same numbers: every comparison is like for like", in place of "Both converted to bytes…".
  • The MetricService point reads "Memory is read through TM1py's MetricService, the same call on v11 and v12", without presenting unit conversion as a feature.
  • The point about keeping the checkpoint in TM1's file storage is removed, along with the section's "Checkpoints →" link.

Features, "Checkpoint and resume" card

  • It describes what the checkpoint is for: a reorder can take a long time on a big cube and a connection can drop, so every tested order is saved as it finishes. Running the same command again picks up where it left off, including an order that was mid-reorder when it stopped.
  • The example commands show continuing and starting over. --tm1-checkpoint is no longer shown.

Web UI section

  • "Runs on your machine and connects to any TM1 server it can reach over the REST API", in place of "talks only to your TM1 servers".
  • The report opens from the cube's Reports tab, which is the tab's current name.

The landing page builds cleanly (vite build).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

nicolasbisurgi and others added 2 commits September 29, 2026 18:10
…, without the unit detail

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…nnection, and the UI reaches any TM1 server

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@nicolasbisurgi
nicolasbisurgi merged commit 7fe68f2 into cubewise-code:optimuspy2dot0 Sep 29, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant