Skip to content

fix(lammps): emit valid spin atom style sections#1032

Open
njzjz-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
deepmodeling:masterfrom
njzjz-bot:fix/issue-885
Open

fix(lammps): emit valid spin atom style sections#1032
njzjz-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
deepmodeling:masterfrom
njzjz-bot:fix/issue-885

Conversation

@njzjz-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes #885.

Mark spin-vector data as Atoms # spin, support automatic spin-style parsing, and validate the generated file with LAMMPS.

Tests: cd tests && python -m unittest test_lammps_spin (LAMMPS integration skips when the executable/package is unavailable).

Why existing tests missed it: The previous test only inspected text; it emitted nine-column spin rows under an atomic-style header that LAMMPS rejects.

Coding agent: Codex
Codex version: codex-cli 0.144.4
Model: gpt-5.6-sol
Reasoning effort: xhigh

Mark data files with spin vectors as Atoms # spin and teach automatic parsing about the official spin atom style. Add a LAMMPS integration regression; the previous test only inspected text while the atomic header made LAMMPS reject the extra columns.

Coding-Agent: Codex
Codex-Version: codex-cli 0.144.4
Model: gpt-5.6-sol
Reasoning-Effort: xhigh
@dosubot dosubot Bot added size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. dpdata lammps labels Jul 16, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@njzjz-bot, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 59 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 72aee5a1-7409-4ef5-b469-3a40f2afcadd

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0416b54 and c7cdaac.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • dpdata/formats/lammps/lmp.py
  • dpdata/plugins/lammps.py
  • tests/test_lammps_spin.py

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will not alter performance

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

✅ 2 untouched benchmarks


Comparing njzjz-bot:fix/issue-885 (c7cdaac) with master (0416b54)

Open in CodSpeed

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.87%. Comparing base (0416b54) to head (c7cdaac).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1032   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.87%   86.87%           
=======================================
  Files          89       89           
  Lines        8266     8269    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits         7181     7184    +3     
  Misses       1085     1085           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dpdata lammps size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] additional information added when converting from abacus/stru to lammps

1 participant