Skip to content

PrintProgressive: Add class implementation. - #82

Merged
SwareJonge merged 1 commit into
doldecomp:mainfrom
cristian64:printprogressive
Sep 17, 2026
Merged

SwareJonge merged 1 commit into
doldecomp:mainfrom
cristian64:printprogressive

Conversation

@cristian64

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@cristian64
cristian64 force-pushed the printprogressive branch 6 times, most recently from 6f721fb to c8094bf Compare September 16, 2026 17:27
@decomp-dev

decomp-dev Bot commented Sep 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Report for MarioClub_us (2a9eb75 - 868b340)

📈 Matched code: 47.09% (+0.15%, +4800 bytes)
📈 Linked code: 41.93% (+0.16%, +5012 bytes)
📈 Matched data: 24.89% (+0.01%, +48 bytes)
📈 Linked data: 32.44% (+0.03%, +268 bytes)

✅ 8 new matches
Unit Item Bytes Before After
main/Kameda/PrintProgressive PrintProgressive::PrintProgressive(JKRHeap*) +1648 0.24% 100.00%
main/Kameda/PrintProgressive PrintProgressive::calc(int) +1352 0.29% 100.00%
main/Kameda/PrintProgressive PrintProgressive::init(PrintProgressive::MessageID) +1312 0.30% 100.00%
main/Kameda/PrintProgressive PrintProgressive::isMessage() +144 2.70% 100.00%
main/Kameda/PrintProgressive PrintProgressive::isChoice() +136 2.86% 100.00%
main/Kameda/PrintProgressive PrintProgressive::draw() +124 3.12% 100.00%
main/Kameda/PrintProgressive PrintProgressive::getCounter() +57 6.67% 100.00%
main/Kameda/PrintProgressive .sdata2 +48 0.00% 100.00%
📈 1 improvement in an unmatched item
Unit Item Bytes Before After
main/Kameda/PrintProgressive .rodata +173 0.00% 98.85%

@cristian64
cristian64 marked this pull request as ready for review September 16, 2026 17:31
Comment thread src/Kameda/PrintProgressive.cpp Outdated
Comment thread src/Kameda/PrintProgressive.cpp Outdated
@SwareJonge
SwareJonge merged commit ffc513c into doldecomp:main Sep 17, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants