456: catalog update nox task descriptions

[jana-selva]

Fixes #456

Checklist

Note: If any of the items in the checklist are not relevant to your PR, just check the box.

For any Pull Request

Is the following correct:

• the title of the Pull Request?
• the title of the corresponding issue?
• there are no other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?
• that the issue which this Pull Request fixes ("Fixes...") is mentioned?

When Changes Were Made

Did you:

• update the changelog?
• update the cookiecutter-template?
• update the implementation?
• check coverage and add tests: unit tests and, if relevant, integration tests?
• update the User Guide & other documentation?
• resolve any failing CI criteria (incl. Sonar quality gate)?

When Preparing a Release

Have you:

• thought about version number (major, minor, patch)?
• checked Exasol packages for updates and resolved open vulnerabilities, if easily possible?

[ArBridgeman]

• Please also update the custom workflows to use v10.
• Please remove the GITHUB_TOKEN lines from slow-checks.yml https://github.com/exasol/python-toolbox/blob/main/.github/workflows/slow-checks.yml#L23

[jana-selva]

after removing GITHUB_TOKEN, the CI failed, so i had to add with block to fix on that.. is this right or should i think of different approach ?

[ckunki]

Why did you remove GITHUB_TOKEN in the first place?

I think this test was designed as an integration test and should not patch the access to GitHub.
It should also not patch the access to GitHub when there is no GitHub Token.

The fix is rather to ensure having a GitHub token.

I propose to re-add GitHub token to file slow-checks.yml.

[ArBridgeman]

Yeah, I had suggested removing it. It's an artifact in many of the repositories but not in this case, it appears.

[ckunki]

Why did you remove GITHUB_TOKEN in the first place?

I think this test was designed as an integration test and should not patch the access to GitHub.
It should also not patch the access to GitHub when there is no GitHub Token.

The fix is rather to ensure having a GitHub token.

I propose to re-add GitHub token to file slow-checks.yml.

[ckunki]

@ArBridgeman wrote

• Please remove the GITHUB_TOKEN lines from slow-checks.yml https://github.com/exasol/python-toolbox/blob/main/.github/workflows/slow-checks.yml#L23

It turned our this var is required for at least some of the integration tests, in particular security_integration_test.py.

[jana-selva]

• Please also update the custom workflows to use v10.

• Please remove the GITHUB_TOKEN lines from slow-checks.yml https://github.com/exasol/python-toolbox/blob/main/.github/workflows/slow-checks.yml#L23

I reverted that part: GITHUB_TOKEN is re-added in slow-checks.yml, and the mock-based test workaround was removed. The integration test depends on real gh access, so keeping the token is the better fit here.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud