Skip to content

fix: reconcile rule 6 defined designations with rule 1 summaries - #14

Merged
fayerman-source merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/rule-6-summaries
Oct 17, 2026
Merged

fayerman-source merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/rule-6-summaries

Conversation

@fayerman-source

@fayerman-source fayerman-source commented Oct 17, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Two rule-conflict fixes flagged by CodeAnt on earlier PRs.

Rule 6 vs. rule 1 (from #13). The defined-designation clause told the agent never to lowercase a defined party designation. Rule 1 tells it to minimize capitalized defined terms in introductory summaries and cover pages. One sentence in rule 6 now says rule 1 still governs summaries, where an everyday equivalent is fine as long as the document defines the designation before the body relies on it. The §20 sample note says the same.

Intro vs. rule 8 (from #9). The opening line promised rewrites "without touching legal terms of art," but rule 8 permits one lay-facing substitution. The line now says the skill preserves terms of art and points at section III, which holds the exception.

@codeant-ai

codeant-ai Bot commented Oct 17, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 CodeAnt AI — Review Status

Status Commit Started (UTC) Finished (UTC)
✅ Reviewed your PR 98a3a4a Oct 17, 2026 · 13:24 13:25

@codeant-ai

codeant-ai Bot commented Oct 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for using CodeAnt! 🎉

We're free for open-source projects. if you're enjoying it, help us grow by sharing.

Share on X ·
Reddit ·
LinkedIn

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 17, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-17T13:25:13.675654Z 98a3a4a PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@codeant-ai codeant-ai Bot added the size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files label Oct 17, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ No major issues detected

@codeant-ai

codeant-ai Bot commented Oct 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CodeAnt PR Risk: Low Risk

  • The PR appears safe to merge; it makes a narrow clarification to party-naming guidance and examples.

Assessed commit: 98a3a4a76bb1

@fayerman-source
fayerman-source merged commit 851e5f2 into main Oct 17, 2026
1 check passed
@fayerman-source
fayerman-source deleted the fix/rule-6-summaries branch October 17, 2026 13:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant