You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Video Pack build planning: interview and evidence-cited plan #2504
This is the interview and planning slice of #2429. That parent issue remains open for real target-repository code operations, full build/test validation, and deployment evidence. This issue is tracked separately so a planning PR can close only the outcome it actually delivers.
Acceptance criteria
A request to plan a build from a video requires a ready Video Pack whose canonical video and pack identities match; missing, processing, error, and identity-only packs fail closed.
The hosted Studio and App Builder chat clients show the use-case interview questions, collect the answers, and preserve planning intent and pack identity on the follow-up turn.
A completed interview returns a plan that separates user-supplied answers from cited Video Pack excerpts and marks unsupported frontend, backend, middleware, database, LSP, MCP, tool, and environment choices as unknown.
Normal non-planning pack chat remains grounded in the existing model path, and an unbound request cannot emit a deterministic video-derived plan.
Focused route/client tests and the affected project build/test checks pass. The PR description states what is still unverified in a live codebase.
Scope
Implementation PR: #2431. This issue does not cover autonomous target-repository implementation or deployment from #2429. The separate Sparkle template-slot objective in #2428 is also outside this issue.
Activity
linear-code commentedon Oct 29, 2026
GRV-859
github-actions commentedon Oct 29, 2026
👋 Thanks for opening this issue! It has been automatically labeled for triage.