Update npm package sharp to v0.35.4 [SECURITY] - abandoned

[hash-dependencies]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
sharp (source, changelog)	0.35.3 → 0.35.4

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

sharp: Vulnerabilities in libheif: GHSA-g89c-p67h-r497 and GHSA-2jg2-4ch7-h545

GHSA-rgj7-g3m4-5g8c

More information

Details

Impact

A number of vulnerabilities, two rated as "Critical" severity using CVSSv3, have been discovered and fixed in the upstream libheif dependency. These can lead to possible remote code execution (RCE) on glibc-based Linux when run under certain conditions.

The attack vector for these claims to be "network" however sharp does not provide any networking features so this vulnerability is down-rated to a "High" severity using CVSSv4 but please note its Subsequent System Impact.

Those processing untrusted input with versions of sharp prior to 0.35.4 are affected.

Patches

Using prebuilt binaries provided by sharp?

Most people rely on the prebuilt binaries provided by sharp.

Please upgrade sharp to the latest version, currently 0.35.4, which provides libheif 1.23.2.

Using a globally-installed libheif?

Please ensure you are using the latest libheif 1.23.2.

Workarounds

Add the following to your code to prevent sharp from decoding AVIF images.

sharp.block({ operation: ["VipsForeignLoadHeif"] });

Ensure you are using a node executable binary compiled as a Position Independent Executable (PIE). Most Linux package managers already do this for protection against RCE however be warned that the "official" Node.js binaries do not.

References

• CVE-2026-84383
• GHSA-2jg2-4ch7-h545

Severity

• CVSS Score: 8.9 / 10 (High)
• Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

References

• https://github.com/lovell/sharp/security/advisories/GHSA-rgj7-g3m4-5g8c
• https://github.com/strukturag/libheif/security/advisories/GHSA-2jg2-4ch7-h545
• https://github.com/strukturag/libheif/security/advisories/GHSA-g89c-p67h-r497
• https://github.com/lovell/sharp/releases/tag/v0.35.4
• https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rgj7-g3m4-5g8c

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

---

Release Notes

lovell/sharp (sharp)

v0.35.4

Compare Source

https://github.com/lovell/sharp-libvips/releases/tag/v1.3.3

• Bound resize dimensions to coordinate limit.

• Bound composite left and top to coordinate limit.
  #​4564
  @​metsw24-max

• Round palette bit depth up for png and gif colours.
  #​4569
  @​metsw24-max

• Ensure tiff.subifd input option is used.
  #​4572
  @​metsw24-max

• Ensure info.pages is correct when limiting input page range.
  #​4578
  @​metsw24-max

• Improve support for input Streams finishing before output is requested.
  #​4584
  @​Jaybhade

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

• Branch creation
  • At any time (no schedule defined)
• Automerge
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate CLI.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated
hash	Ready	Preview	Sep 15, 2026 9:22am UTC
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview	Sep 15, 2026 9:22am UTC
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Sep 15, 2026 9:22am UTC
petrinaut-docs	Ready	Preview	Sep 15, 2026 9:22am UTC

[hash-dependencies]

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

• any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
• the branch becomes conflicted, or
• you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
• you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: yarn.lock

➤ YN0000: · Yarn 4.16.0
➤ YN0000: ┌ Project validation
➤ YN0057: │ @apps/plugin-browser: 'nohoist' is deprecated, please use 'installConfig.hoistingLimits' instead
➤ YN0000: └ Completed
➤ YN0000: ┌ Resolution step
➤ YN0085: │ + sharp@npm:0.35.4, @emnapi/runtime@npm:1.11.3, @img/sharp-darwin-arm64@npm:0.35.4, @img/sharp-darwin-x64@npm:0.35.4, @img/sharp-freebsd-wasm32@npm:0.35.4, and 23 more.
➤ YN0000: └ Completed in 0s 858ms
➤ YN0000: ┌ Post-resolution validation
➤ YN0060: │ @astrojs/markdown-remark is listed by your project with version 7.2.4 (ped3581), which doesn't satisfy what astro and other dependencies request (7.2.2).
➤ YN0060: │ @types/react is listed by your project with version 19.2.14 (p99e71d), which doesn't satisfy what react-remove-scroll (via @tldraw/tldraw) and other dependencies request (but they have non-overlapping ranges!).
➤ YN0060: │ eslint is listed by your project with version 9.39.4 (p88bec7), which doesn't satisfy what eslint-config-airbnb and other dependencies request (but they have non-overlapping ranges!).
➤ YN0060: │ eslint-plugin-react-hooks is listed by your project with version 7.0.1 (p699002), which doesn't satisfy what eslint-config-airbnb requests (^4.3.0).
➤ YN0060: │ graphology is listed by your project with version 0.26.0 (p418068), which doesn't satisfy what @react-sigma/core requests (~0.25.4).
➤ YN0060: │ react is listed by your project with version 19.2.6 (p297d1e), which doesn't satisfy what material-ui-popup-state and other dependencies request (but they have non-overlapping ranges!).
➤ YN0060: │ react is listed by your project with version 19.2.6 (p327a01), which doesn't satisfy what react-inspector (via @hashintel/ds-components) and other dependencies request (but they have non-overlapping ranges!).
➤ YN0060: │ react is listed by your project with version 19.2.6 (p53dd30), which doesn't satisfy what react-inspector (via @ladle/react) and other dependencies request (but they have non-overlapping ranges!).
➤ YN0060: │ react is listed by your project with version 19.2.6 (p5a9f3c), which doesn't satisfy what @apollo/client and other dependencies request (but they have non-overlapping ranges!).
➤ YN0060: │ react is listed by your project with version 19.2.6 (p656648), which doesn't satisfy what react-inspector (via @hashintel/ds-components) and other dependencies request (but they have non-overlapping ranges!).
➤ YN0060: │ react is listed by your project with version 19.2.6 (p9bfa18), which doesn't satisfy what react-inspector (via @hashintel/ds-components) and other dependencies request (but they have non-overlapping ranges!).
➤ YN0060: │ react is listed by your project with version 19.2.6 (pb2c0b1), which doesn't satisfy what @apollo/client and other dependencies request (but they have non-overlapping ranges!).
➤ YN0060: │ react-dom is listed by your project with version 19.2.6 (pbfb936), which doesn't satisfy what @apollo/client and other dependencies request (but they have non-overlapping ranges!).
➤ YN0060: │ react-hook-form is listed by your project with version 7.65.0 (pf60118), which doesn't satisfy what @hashintel/query-editor and other dependencies request (7.61.1).
➤ YN0060: │ storybook is listed by your project with version 9.1.19 (p14b1b3), which doesn't satisfy what eslint-plugin-storybook requests (^10.3.1).
➤ YN0060: │ storybook is listed by your project with version 9.1.19 (pa824a9), which doesn't satisfy what eslint-plugin-storybook requests (^10.3.1).
➤ YN0060: │ storybook is listed by your project with version 9.1.19 (pcf516a), which doesn't satisfy what eslint-plugin-storybook requests (^10.3.1).
➤ YN0060: │ storybook is listed by your project with version 9.1.19 (pf24719), which doesn't satisfy what eslint-plugin-storybook requests (^10.3.1).
➤ YN0060: │ type-fest is listed by your project with version 5.3.1 (pf96305), which doesn't satisfy what @pmmmwh/react-refresh-webpack-plugin requests (>=0.17.0 <5.0.0).
➤ YN0060: │ vitest is listed by your project with version 4.1.10 (p1105ba), which doesn't satisfy what @effect/vitest and other dependencies request (but they have non-overlapping ranges!).
➤ YN0060: │ zod is listed by your project with version 4.4.3 (p3cb446), which doesn't satisfy what zod-to-json-schema and other dependencies request (^3.25.0).
➤ YN0002: │ @apps/brunch-agent@workspace:apps/brunch-agent doesn't provide zod (p783fc3), requested by @anthropic-ai/sdk and other dependencies.
➤ YN0002: │ @apps/hash-ai-worker-ts@workspace:apps/hash-ai-worker-ts doesn't provide @llamaindex/core (p84f0aa), requested by @llamaindex/readers.
➤ YN0002: │ @apps/hash-ai-worker-ts@workspace:apps/hash-ai-worker-ts doesn't provide @llamaindex/env (p06d4a4), requested by @llamaindex/readers.
➤ YN0002: │ @apps/hash-ai-worker-ts@workspace:apps/hash-ai-worker-ts doesn't provide react (p686178), requested by @blockprotocol/core and other dependencies.
➤ YN0002: │ @apps/hash-api@workspace:apps/hash-api doesn't provide react (p7e58b9), requested by @blockprotocol/core and other dependencies.
➤ YN0002: │ @apps/hash-frontend@workspace:apps/hash-frontend doesn't provide @codemirror/view (pc99a9f), requested by @uiw/react-codemirror.
➤ YN0002: │ @apps/hash-frontend@workspace:apps/hash-frontend doesn't provide react-is (pe06c1b), requested by recharts.
➤ YN0002: │ @apps/hash-integration-worker@workspace:apps/hash-integration-worker doesn't provide react (p652198), requested by @blockprotocol/graph.
➤ YN0002: │ @apps/plugin-browser@workspace:apps/plugin-browser doesn't provide webpack-sources (p2d6859), requested by zip-webpack-plugin.
➤ YN0002: │ @blockprotocol/graph@workspace:libs/@blockprotocol/graph [da39f] doesn't provide @types/json-schema (p7740d4), requested by @apidevtools/json-schema-ref-parser.
➤ YN0002: │ @blockprotocol/graph@workspace:libs/@blockprotocol/graph [e419a] doesn't provide @types/json-schema (pa38d4c), requested by @apidevtools/json-schema-ref-parser.
➤ YN0002: │ @blockprotocol/graph@workspace:libs/@blockprotocol/graph doesn't provide @types/json-schema (p15605f), requested by @apidevtools/json-schema-ref-parser.
➤ YN0002: │ @blockprotocol/graph@workspace:libs/@blockprotocol/graph doesn't provide react (p975fc7), requested by @blockprotocol/core.
➤ YN0002: │ @hashintel/block-design-system@workspace:libs/@hashintel/block-design-system [482cc] doesn't provide prop-types (pdc545e), requested by react-type-animation.
➤ YN0002: │ @hashintel/block-design-system@workspace:libs/@hashintel/block-design-system [64938] doesn't provide prop-types (p520cec), requested by react-type-animation.
➤ YN0002: │ @hashintel/block-design-system@workspace:libs/@hashintel/block-design-system doesn't provide prop-types (pdf5207), requested by react-type-animation.
➤ YN0002: │ @hashintel/brunch-agent-transport-aisdk@workspace:libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/transport-aisdk doesn't provide zod (p91c509), requested by ai.
➤ YN0002: │ @hashintel/ds-components@workspace:libs/@hashintel/ds-components [482cc] doesn't provide esbuild (pdd3db9), requested by esbuild-plugin-svgr and other dependencies.
➤ YN0002: │ @hashintel/ds-components@workspace:libs/@hashintel/ds-components [482cc] doesn't provide playwright (pf22dae), requested by @vitest/browser-playwright.
➤ YN0002: │ @hashintel/ds-components@workspace:libs/@hashintel/ds-components [c2099] doesn't provide esbuild (p62400f), requested by esbuild-plugin-svgr and other dependencies.
➤ YN0002: │ @hashintel/ds-components@workspace:libs/@hashintel/ds-components [c2099] doesn't provide playwright (pe7944e), requested by @vitest/browser-playwright.
➤ YN0002: │ @hashintel/ds-components@workspace:libs/@hashintel/ds-components doesn't provide esbuild (pe4a1b8), requested by esbuild-plugin-svgr and other dependencies.
➤ YN0002: │ @hashintel/ds-components@workspace:libs/@hashintel/ds-components doesn't provide playwright (pe68d39), requested by @vitest/browser-playwright.
➤ YN0002: │ @hashintel/petrinaut@workspace:libs/@hashintel/petrinaut [482cc] doesn't provide zod (p3e879a), requested by ai.
➤ YN0002: │ @hashintel/petrinaut@workspace:libs/@hashintel/petrinaut [95a4e] doesn't provide zod (pe8cf49), requested by ai.
➤ YN0002: │ @hashintel/petrinaut@workspace:libs/@hashintel/petrinaut [c2099] doesn't provide zod (pe7c2dd), requested by ai.
➤ YN0002: │ @hashintel/petrinaut@workspace:libs/@hashintel/petrinaut doesn't provide zod (p3323f1), requested by ai.
➤ YN0002: │ @local/eslint@workspace:libs/@local/eslint doesn't provide eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y (p90ae76), requested by eslint-config-airbnb.
➤ YN0002: │ @local/eslint@workspace:libs/@local/eslint doesn't provide eslint-plugin-react (p47f64a), requested by eslint-config-airbnb.
➤ YN0002: │ @local/eslint@workspace:libs/@local/eslint doesn't provide storybook (p77c4dc), requested by eslint-plugin-storybook.
➤ YN0002: │ @local/harpc-client@workspace:libs/@local/harpc/client/typescript doesn't provide @effect/workflow (p5c866d), requested by @effect/cluster.
➤ YN0002: │ @local/hash-backend-utils@workspace:libs/@local/hash-backend-utils doesn't provide react (pe5f543), requested by @blockprotocol/core and other dependencies.
➤ YN0002: │ @local/hash-graph-sdk@workspace:libs/@local/graph/sdk/typescript doesn't provide react (p5e03d4), requested by @blockprotocol/graph.
➤ YN0002: │ @local/hash-isomorphic-utils@workspace:libs/@local/hash-isomorphic-utils doesn't provide react-dom (p3d46d6), requested by @apollo/client and other dependencies.
➤ YN0002: │ @local/repo-chores@workspace:libs/@local/repo-chores/node doesn't provide react (pe2fb17), requested by @blockprotocol/core.
➤ YN0002: │ @tests/hash-backend-integration@workspace:tests/hash-backend-integration doesn't provide graphql-request (p792347), requested by @graphql-codegen/typescript-graphql-request.
➤ YN0002: │ @tests/hash-backend-integration@workspace:tests/hash-backend-integration doesn't provide graphql-tag (pa67a63), requested by @graphql-codegen/typescript-graphql-request.
➤ YN0002: │ @tests/hash-backend-integration@workspace:tests/hash-backend-integration doesn't provide react (pec02bf), requested by @blockprotocol/graph.
➤ YN0002: │ @tests/hash-playwright@workspace:tests/hash-playwright doesn't provide react (p373b8b), requested by @blockprotocol/graph.
➤ YN0086: │ Some peer dependencies are incorrectly met by your project; run yarn explain peer-requirements <hash> for details, where <hash> is the six-letter p-prefixed code.
➤ YN0086: │ Some peer dependencies are incorrectly met by dependencies; run yarn explain peer-requirements for details.
➤ YN0000: └ Completed
➤ YN0000: ┌ Fetch step
➤ YN0013: │ 5 packages were added to the project (+ 28.26 MiB).
➤ YN0000: └ Completed in 0s 575ms
➤ YN0000: ┌ Link step
➤ YN0073: │ Skipped due to mode=update-lockfile
➤ YN0000: └ Completed
➤ YN0000: ┌ Post-install validation
➤ YN0001: │ Error: Cannot find module '@yarnpkg/types'
Require stack:
- /tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/yarn.config.cjs
- /home/runner/.cache/node/corepack/v1/yarn/4.16.0/yarn.js
    at Module._resolveFilename (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1564:15)
    at wrapResolveFilename (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1118:27)
    at defaultResolveImplForCJSLoading (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1142:10)
    at resolveForCJSWithHooks (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1169:12)
    at Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1341:5)
    at wrapModuleLoad (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:261:19)
    at Module.require (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1674:12)
    at require (node:internal/modules/helpers:157:16)
    at Object.<anonymous> (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/yarn.config.cjs:7:26)
    at Module._compile (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1929:14)
➤ YN0000: └ Completed
➤ YN0000: · Failed with errors in 1s 864ms

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Patch-level dependency bump with no source changes; main residual risk is native binary behavior in image pipelines (docs site, favicon tooling, Next transitive sharp).

Overview
Bumps sharp from 0.35.3 to 0.35.4 across the monorepo: direct deps in @apps/petrinaut-docs and @apps/petrinaut-website, plus the root resolutions entry for next/sharp. yarn.lock is refreshed so platform packages (@img/sharp-*) and bundled libvips (1.3.2 → 1.3.3) align with the new release.

This is a security-driven patch upgrade (libheif issues addressed in sharp’s prebuilt binaries). No application code changes—only dependency versions and the lockfile.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit a7a1bc2. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 65.89%. Comparing base (fb728e4) to head (a7a1bc2).
⚠️ Report is 45 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9611      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   65.90%   65.89%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1887     1887              
  Lines      198443   198443              
  Branches     8248     8248              
==========================================
- Hits       130774   130773       -1     
- Misses      66139    66140       +1     
  Partials     1530     1530              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.99% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	15.35% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-graph	12.54% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	38.15% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.49% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	3.27% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.02% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	12.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	2.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.81% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.21% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-config	81.14% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	19.71% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-atlas	80.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authentication	96.02% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	63.14% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-embeddings	91.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	32.15% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	48.41% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	50.18% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	84.71% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-middleware	90.92% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	89.63% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	28.39% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	78.92% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	79.82% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.09% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	87.92% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

⚠️ 6 benchmarks measured no execution time

Nothing ran under measurement, usually because the compiler removed the code under test. These results are not comparable, so they count as unchanged.

Preventing compiler optimizations

✅ 98 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚠️	as_constant	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	constant_equal	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	constant_not_equal	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	access	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	runtime_equal	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	runtime_not_equal	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A

---

_{Comparing deps/js/npm-sharp-vulnerability (a7a1bc2) with main (9cd2082)¹}

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on main (466cc6b) during the generation of this report, so 9cd2082 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[hash-dependencies]

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 255 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.353 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.710 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$12.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 124 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.651 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 365 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.119 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 148 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.290 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$24.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 255 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.143 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.631 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.259 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 126 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.296 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.242 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.033 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.606 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.828 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.523 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.840 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 36.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.195 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.210 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.629 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.710 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.379 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.177 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.149 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.344 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.540 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.243 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.654 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.810 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.714 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.562 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.066 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.350 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.147 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.754 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$31.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 233 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.896 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$70.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 596 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}32.0 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$35.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 436 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.649 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$39.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 292 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.584 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$41.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 393 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.945 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$33.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 271 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.658 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$416 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.79 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}63.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$88.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 927 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.408 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$78.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 523 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.790 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$273 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.05 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.354 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$10.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.423 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$10.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.434 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.357 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$10.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 94.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.284 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$10.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.212 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$10.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.691 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$10.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.633 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$10.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.529 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$10.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.291 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.813 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.501 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 104 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.983 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.329 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.350 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.562 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.158 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.075 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.812 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.674 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$7.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 48.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.968 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$54.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 306 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.251 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 628 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.506 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$61.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 458 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.724 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$69.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 474 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.986 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$78.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 469 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.560 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$85.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 632 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.982 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$45.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.321 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$72.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 585 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.975 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$50.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 369 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.796 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$59.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 421 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.193 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$61.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 376 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.988 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$61.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 546 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.751 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 657 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.654 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$118 \mathrm{ms} \pm 645 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.149 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$22.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 153 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$518 \mathrm{ms} \pm 895 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

[hash-dependencies]

Autoclosing Skipped

This PR has been flagged for autoclosing. However, it is being skipped due to the branch being already modified. Please close/delete it manually or report a bug if you think this is in error.

[claude]

Superseded by #9701, which put sharp 0.35.4 — the version this PR targets — on main. Merged three-way against main this PR produces no change outside yarn.lock, so closing.

---

Generated by Claude Code