BE-849: atlas: response documents and authorization

[indietyp]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Add the response documents and the authorization that guards them. Every document type (tile, edges, locate, translate, manifest) builds from one captured Scene, encodes through one codec layer into the saltile envelope, and the envelope records its own content type. Authority tokens bind a request to the actor, the requested generation and the DeltaId, so a token from a retired lifetime refuses uniformly.

The module stays dead code under the lib.rs attribute until the read API consumes it (BE-815). api::problem, the problem-type vocabulary the API returns, arrives here for the same reason and under the same attribute.

For review, the properties this stands on:

• Every response comes from one snapshot: a document reads only its Scene.
• Authority validation binds the generation and the DeltaId, never a DeltaRevision; renewal on the same filter keeps its offset, and a changed filter rebinds.
• Authority-token expiry, visibility-cache age and retained-generation admission are distinct checks even when the host derives them from one maximum duration.
• The saltile envelope carries its content type, so the API returns what the document says it is.

🔍 What does this change?

• serve/document/: the Document trait and the tile, edges, locate, translate and manifest documents, each with its codec.
• serve/document/codec/: the column and CBOR codecs and the saltile envelope.
• serve/authorization/: Authority, EncryptedToken, Scope with its lease, and the archived actor identities a token carries.
• api/problem.rs: the problem types.
• serve/tests: the delta pipeline's end-to-end tests over the documents.

❓ How to test this?

1. cargo nextest run -p hash-graph-atlas --all-features serve::document:: serve::authorization:: runs the document, codec and token tests.
2. Reading order: serve/document/mod.rs for the trait, then serve/authorization/mod.rs.

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• do not affect the execution graph

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated
hash	Ready	Preview	Sep 15, 2026 2:49pm UTC

3 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	Sep 15, 2026 2:49pm UTC
petrinaut	Skipped		Sep 15, 2026 2:49pm UTC
petrinaut-docs	Skipped		Sep 15, 2026 2:49pm UTC

[github-advanced-security]

clippy found more than 20 potential problems in the proposed changes. Check the Files changed tab for more details.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 82.19246% with 359 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 73.93%. Comparing base (a2a97b2) to head (fc4e80c).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
libs/@local/graph/atlas/src/api/problem.rs	55.87%	154 Missing ⚠️
...l/graph/atlas/src/serve/authorization/authority.rs	0.00%	89 Missing ⚠️
...local/graph/atlas/src/serve/authorization/actor.rs	0.00%	28 Missing ⚠️
...al/graph/atlas/src/serve/document/translate/mod.rs	80.00%	12 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...ph/atlas/src/serve/document/translate/codec/mod.rs	52.00%	12 Missing ⚠️
.../graph/atlas/src/serve/document/locate/subgraph.rs	97.33%	6 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
...local/graph/atlas/src/serve/authorization/error.rs	0.00%	9 Missing ⚠️
...local/graph/atlas/src/serve/authorization/scope.rs	78.57%	9 Missing ⚠️
...local/graph/atlas/src/serve/authorization/token.rs	43.75%	9 Missing ⚠️
...@local/graph/atlas/src/serve/document/edges/mod.rs	92.80%	9 Missing ⚠️
... and 2 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@                                       Coverage Diff                                       @@
##           bm/be-848-atlas-visibility-resolution-and-the-request-scene    #9713      +/-   ##
===============================================================================================
+ Coverage                                                        73.60%   73.93%   +0.32%     
===============================================================================================
  Files                                                             1423     1446      +23     
  Lines                                                           142238   144254    +2016     
  Branches                                                          6025     6064      +39     
===============================================================================================
+ Hits                                                            104696   106652    +1956     
- Misses                                                           36250    36308      +58     
- Partials                                                          1292     1294       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-graph	13.62% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-atlas	81.70% <82.19%> (+0.63%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[cursor]

PR Summary

High Risk
Adds cryptographic authority tokens and a broad client-visible error/auth mapping layer; mistakes in sealing, expiry, or problem redaction directly affect security and API behavior.

Overview
Introduces the Atlas read-path foundations that sit ahead of HTTP routes: a shared RFC 9457 error surface and actor-bound authority tokens, plus the binary/JSON document codecs response bodies will use.

api/problem defines Surface v1 problem types (/problems/atlas/*), maps handler and middleware failures (documents, visibility, auth, rate limits) into application/problem+json, redacts internal errors while logging full reports, and adds a Tower layer to turn Result errors into problem responses. The api module is wired in lib.rs but marked dead until the route layer lands.

serve/authorization seals a fixed scope (generation, delta lifetime, actor, optional filter digest, delivery zoom k) into reusable XChaCha20-Poly1305 tokens with HKDF-derived keys; verification binds actor/generation/delta before expiry, and current vs continuity scope views separate data admission from renewal.

serve/document/codec adds the saltile v1 envelope (magic kind, slot directory, 8-byte padding), CBOR and little-endian column writers, and encoders such as CurrentDocument JSON and EdgesResponse → SALTILEE (HEAD map + source/target/identity columns + optional hydrated trailer).

serve/delta/tests adds a large integration suite over withdrawals, schedules, walks, and locate behavior against captured scenes.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 8dfe578. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 258 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.912 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.992 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$13.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 145 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.279 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$46.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 457 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.106 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 135 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.961 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$26.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.119 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$29.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 248 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.100 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.269 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 133 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.410 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$4.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.99 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 43.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.038 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.252 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.242 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.452 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 38.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.486 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.474 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.467 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.851 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.982 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.802 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.239 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 36.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.574 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.396 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.524 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.942 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$33.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.542 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$72.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 518 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.642 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$37.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 259 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.146 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$39.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 279 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.313 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$44.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 266 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$35.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$419 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.05 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.110 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$89.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 641 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.829 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$81.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 429 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$281 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.34 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.703 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.443 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$11.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.945 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$12.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$12.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$12.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 107 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.477 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.738 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$11.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.334 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.302 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.569 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.113 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 100 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.974 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 51.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.303 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$56.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 425 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.711 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 583 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.280 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$63.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 618 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.299 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$72.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 524 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$81.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 655 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$88.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 577 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$47.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 379 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.468 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$73.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 564 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.212 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$54.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 439 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.335 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$63.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 451 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.247 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$61.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 448 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.075 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 481 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.358 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$112 \mathrm{ms} \pm 814 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.869 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$125 \mathrm{ms} \pm 904 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.274 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$24.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.058 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$513 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.53 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph